A category within the money supply that includes M1 in addition to all time-related deposits, savings deposits, and non-institutional money-market funds.In other words, M2 is liquid money (M1) plus assets consumers can readily access, but usually use as "back-up" funds like savings accounts and money market accounts. This is money that people keep in reserve.
M2 is a broader classification of money than M1. Economists use M2 when looking to quantify the amount of money in circulation and trying to explain different economic monetary conditions.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi2xz6fZjmxwWO_r4cQWEZjEyfflNcJv85boxLLZucBNSkiJSvhsPAh_609VznjjdNRxNfhz4Ekl_42sVSWZzVSZkdiAosnqTQw4fopilMwNAMklC9fFEn_QkslmNbxVAMOPvOcuTc-Tqw/s400/M2Log.png)
Let's begin our look at M2 with a simple logarithmic chart of M2. Notice that -- unlike M1 -- M2's rise is far more consistent over the last 25 years. While its rise was somewhat slower during the first part of the 1990s expansion, its rise continued in the mid-1990s and has moved higher at near the same pace for the last 15 years.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZTgDKDVu-fwpyAwZ-TifHI5IypGEejQM2o89ZjRX3nwPZEeijD10pt3Upnuute7FzVxOO88yOl2v_0nzxzXcYHN-peI6Om2Imc1r1b5jOUlgAQS2gcM7tnIQCQ7I6kp2foe7QoINaFhg/s400/M2GDP+Scale+100.png)
Above is a chart that shows M2 and GDP on a scale of 100 to better compare their relative performance. Note that unlike the M1 chart from yesterday, this chart shows a closely correlated performance of both numbers, indicating a strong relationship.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj63AzymwkYN8E2RqT5vnwn67hvkW7sh2U7sKK11OUOPB6IcVOQwdVj49nw1GGKqCKsQsHeOnIG0GVYkbu1sLmbU5B-u5Ipa6j8R9ei45AasXR6zT7DnQeql889ZNYjTEVUcVg7Z_WcKfI/s400/M2GDPYOY1.png)
The M2/GDP YOY percentage change comparison for the 1980-1994 periods reveals little correlation. At times they move in tandem, but at over times they move in completely opposite directions. There is a general relationship for the 1980s expansion as both lines have a general downward shift, but the relationship is at best casual; no firm conclusions can be drawn from this chart.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUwpHh89bLO7R-BeFJgN5ThaX2MobyC7CEecnPdlrIJrfYczfElNWOI5zijCfGuoIxKSIa146OKa3R5tIQF84ARXVFLFa_DioxNxoW7Y9lQmt8KsgazyqjWc3CPN_3r1cIHA_E9HdCqtg/s400/M2GDPYOY2.png)
![Link](http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif)
The lack of correlation between the YOY percentage change between M2 and GDP continues in this chart that shows the relationship for 1993-2010. In fact during both recessions there is an inverse relationship between the two -- a very counter-factual development indeed.
Like M1, the the YOY charts show nothing meaningful, although the scale 100 charts show a strong overall correlation.
0 nhận xét:
Post a Comment