logo

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Today's Markets

What a difference a Fed statement can make.....

Ever since the Fed cut the discount rate, I have been talking about an upward sloping channel for the SPYs. The index broke that channel today in a big way. Here's the 8-day, 5-minute chart to illustrate.



Here's the chart from today. There was one direction -- down. Notice the big pick-up in volume on the second downward sloping line -- the one that occurred after the release of the Fed minutes.



Here are two 1 month daily charts with two different Fibonacci levels. In the first chart, we're already at the 50% line of support.



In this one we're at the 38.2% line of support



Finally, here is the 3-month daily chart. Notice we are again through the 200 day SMA, which is a bearish sign.



There has been a lot of talk about what the market would do after it's recent post-discount rate cut rally. My guess is we're looking at a double bottom of sorts What is crucial is where the market stops selling and the volume that occurs at that level.

Today's Markets

What a difference a Fed statement can make.....

Ever since the Fed cut the discount rate, I have been talking about an upward sloping channel for the SPYs. The index broke that channel today in a big way. Here's the 8-day, 5-minute chart to illustrate.



Here's the chart from today. There was one direction -- down. Notice the big pick-up in volume on the second downward sloping line -- the one that occurred after the release of the Fed minutes.



Here are two 1 month daily charts with two different Fibonacci levels. In the first chart, we're already at the 50% line of support.



In this one we're at the 38.2% line of support



Finally, here is the 3-month daily chart. Notice we are again through the 200 day SMA, which is a bearish sign.



There has been a lot of talk about what the market would do after it's recent post-discount rate cut rally. My guess is we're looking at a double bottom of sorts What is crucial is where the market stops selling and the volume that occurs at that level.

Fed Minutes

The Fed released the minutes of the August 7 meeting. Because the Fed's perception of the economy is so incredibly important right now, let's take a detailed look at what the Fed is seeing.

The information reviewed at the August meeting suggested that economic activity picked up in the second quarter from the slow pace in the first quarter. On average, the economy expanded at a moderate pace during the first half of the year despite the ongoing drag from the housing sector. While the growth of consumer spending slowed in the second quarter from its rapid pace in prior quarters, wages and salaries increased solidly and household sentiment appeared supportive of further gains in spending. Business fixed investment picked up in the second quarter after little net change in the preceding two quarters. Inventories generally appeared to be well aligned with sales at midyear. Overall inflation receded in June because of a decline in energy prices, while the core personal consumption expenditure (PCE) price index rose bit less than its average pace over the past year.


The basic overall picture is OK. Things aren't too hot or cold. Barry Ritholtz over at the Big Picture has called growth "lumpy" which I think is a really good phrase to describe the general trend. Some areas are doing well and others are clearly dragging.

Private nonfarm payroll employment continued to increase at a healthy pace; the rise in July was about equal to the average increase over the first half of the year.


Bulls have argued employment is one of the big areas of strength in the economy, usually citing the 4.6% unemployment rate. The Fed is confirming this view. A serious drop in employment would be a clear signal there was a problem. However, so long as the Fed thinks employment is on solid ground, they will feel far less pressured to lower the Fed funds rate.

Industrial production picked up in the second quarter after little net change over the preceding two quarters.


This observation ties in with this point:

Economic activity in advanced foreign economies expanded somewhat less rapidly in the second quarter than in the prior quarter, but nonetheless appeared to have grown faster than trend, reflecting upbeat business and consumer confidence as well as favorable labor market conditions.


Another general consensus emerging is growth in US trading partners will help to alleviate the housing slowdown in the US. Starting in the first quarter of this year many commentators (including myself) observed that foreign profits were a big reason for the the first quarter profit increases from the big multi-nationals. So long as other countries continue to grow, US exports should as well.

Outlays for nonresidential construction rose rapidly in the second quarter. Business spending on equipment and software, other than transportation equipment, posted a solid increase after being flat, on net, in the preceding two quarter


Non-residential construction increased at a 22% seasonally adjusted annual rate in the second quarter. This pace is not sustainable. My thought is we are seeing the last hurrah (as it were) from the non-residential construction sector.

In addition, we saw some decent increases in business technology investment.


The growth of real consumer spending slowed considerably in the second quarter after substantial increases earlier in the year. The deceleration primarily reflected sharply slower growth in outlays for goods as purchases of motor vehicles decreased noticeably.

.....

Demand for housing in the second quarter was restrained by higher interest rates and by tightening credit conditions in the subprime mortgage market.


Short version: the consumer -- which is responsible for 70% of US economic growth -- is spending less. This is not a good development.

The statement announcing the policy decision noted that economic growth appeared to have been moderate during the first half of the year, despite the ongoing adjustment in the housing sector. The economy seemed likely to continue to expand at a moderate pace over coming quarters. Readings on core inflation had improved modestly in recent months. However, a sustained moderation in inflation pressures had yet to be convincingly demonstrated. Moreover, the high level of resource utilization had the potential to sustain those pressures. The Committee's predominant policy concern remained the risk that inflation would fail to moderate as expected. Future policy adjustments would depend on the evolution of the outlook for both inflation and economic growth, as implied by incoming information.


The bold-faced sentence from above is the real money quote from the meeting. The Fed is still concerned about inflation, and fighting inflation is still their primary policy orientation. This statement is currently sending markets lower.

The bottom line is this isn't a horrible picture. It says what we already know. Housing is in a nosedive. This is probably having a negative impact on consumer spending. However, other areas of the economy are doing OK. Given this outlook, the Fed is completely justified in not lowering interest rates.

Fed Minutes

The Fed released the minutes of the August 7 meeting. Because the Fed's perception of the economy is so incredibly important right now, let's take a detailed look at what the Fed is seeing.

The information reviewed at the August meeting suggested that economic activity picked up in the second quarter from the slow pace in the first quarter. On average, the economy expanded at a moderate pace during the first half of the year despite the ongoing drag from the housing sector. While the growth of consumer spending slowed in the second quarter from its rapid pace in prior quarters, wages and salaries increased solidly and household sentiment appeared supportive of further gains in spending. Business fixed investment picked up in the second quarter after little net change in the preceding two quarters. Inventories generally appeared to be well aligned with sales at midyear. Overall inflation receded in June because of a decline in energy prices, while the core personal consumption expenditure (PCE) price index rose bit less than its average pace over the past year.


The basic overall picture is OK. Things aren't too hot or cold. Barry Ritholtz over at the Big Picture has called growth "lumpy" which I think is a really good phrase to describe the general trend. Some areas are doing well and others are clearly dragging.

Private nonfarm payroll employment continued to increase at a healthy pace; the rise in July was about equal to the average increase over the first half of the year.


Bulls have argued employment is one of the big areas of strength in the economy, usually citing the 4.6% unemployment rate. The Fed is confirming this view. A serious drop in employment would be a clear signal there was a problem. However, so long as the Fed thinks employment is on solid ground, they will feel far less pressured to lower the Fed funds rate.

Industrial production picked up in the second quarter after little net change over the preceding two quarters.


This observation ties in with this point:

Economic activity in advanced foreign economies expanded somewhat less rapidly in the second quarter than in the prior quarter, but nonetheless appeared to have grown faster than trend, reflecting upbeat business and consumer confidence as well as favorable labor market conditions.


Another general consensus emerging is growth in US trading partners will help to alleviate the housing slowdown in the US. Starting in the first quarter of this year many commentators (including myself) observed that foreign profits were a big reason for the the first quarter profit increases from the big multi-nationals. So long as other countries continue to grow, US exports should as well.

Outlays for nonresidential construction rose rapidly in the second quarter. Business spending on equipment and software, other than transportation equipment, posted a solid increase after being flat, on net, in the preceding two quarter


Non-residential construction increased at a 22% seasonally adjusted annual rate in the second quarter. This pace is not sustainable. My thought is we are seeing the last hurrah (as it were) from the non-residential construction sector.

In addition, we saw some decent increases in business technology investment.


The growth of real consumer spending slowed considerably in the second quarter after substantial increases earlier in the year. The deceleration primarily reflected sharply slower growth in outlays for goods as purchases of motor vehicles decreased noticeably.

.....

Demand for housing in the second quarter was restrained by higher interest rates and by tightening credit conditions in the subprime mortgage market.


Short version: the consumer -- which is responsible for 70% of US economic growth -- is spending less. This is not a good development.

The statement announcing the policy decision noted that economic growth appeared to have been moderate during the first half of the year, despite the ongoing adjustment in the housing sector. The economy seemed likely to continue to expand at a moderate pace over coming quarters. Readings on core inflation had improved modestly in recent months. However, a sustained moderation in inflation pressures had yet to be convincingly demonstrated. Moreover, the high level of resource utilization had the potential to sustain those pressures. The Committee's predominant policy concern remained the risk that inflation would fail to moderate as expected. Future policy adjustments would depend on the evolution of the outlook for both inflation and economic growth, as implied by incoming information.


The bold-faced sentence from above is the real money quote from the meeting. The Fed is still concerned about inflation, and fighting inflation is still their primary policy orientation. This statement is currently sending markets lower.

The bottom line is this isn't a horrible picture. It says what we already know. Housing is in a nosedive. This is probably having a negative impact on consumer spending. However, other areas of the economy are doing OK. Given this outlook, the Fed is completely justified in not lowering interest rates.

And from the Oooops Department....

About a month ago, Google shut my blog down for about a day. They said I had a spam blog. They figured out I didn't have one so I got back up an running.

But to prevent that from happening again I now "moderate" comments. Basically I have to approve all comments. No, I haven't deleted anybody. I'm just making sure no one is doing unwarranted advertising in the comments section.

But, then things like today happen. There were three comments that I wanted to publish but instead clicked reject.

To those of you who commented I am sorry. Sometimes there are just too many buttons to push.

And from the Oooops Department....

About a month ago, Google shut my blog down for about a day. They said I had a spam blog. They figured out I didn't have one so I got back up an running.

But to prevent that from happening again I now "moderate" comments. Basically I have to approve all comments. No, I haven't deleted anybody. I'm just making sure no one is doing unwarranted advertising in the comments section.

But, then things like today happen. There were three comments that I wanted to publish but instead clicked reject.

To those of you who commented I am sorry. Sometimes there are just too many buttons to push.

Case Shiller Index Drops 3.2%

From CNBC:

Home prices across the nation declined by 3.2% in the second quarter from a year earlier, suggesting the housing downturn has deepened, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index.

The national index, which measures all nine U.S. Census divisions, fell to 183.89 last quarter from 189.93 in the same period in 2006, S&P said in a statement.

"This number may still not be at its lowest," Maureen Maitland of S&P told CNBC. "Many people, including Standard & Poor's economists, expect further declines in home prices throughout the year. They're looking for the bottom to go through the end of the year and turn around in 2008."


Here is the difference between this index and the price data in the post two posts below:

The S&P/Case-Shiller index and another by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight track the same home over time and more accurately reflect price trends, economists said.

Gauges from the Commerce Department and the National Association of Realtors can be influenced by changes in the types of homes sold. Higher sales of cheaper homes relative to more-expensive properties will bias the figures down.


This index makes a heck of a lot more sense given the current inventory glut in existing homes.

Case Shiller Index Drops 3.2%

From CNBC:

Home prices across the nation declined by 3.2% in the second quarter from a year earlier, suggesting the housing downturn has deepened, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index.

The national index, which measures all nine U.S. Census divisions, fell to 183.89 last quarter from 189.93 in the same period in 2006, S&P said in a statement.

"This number may still not be at its lowest," Maureen Maitland of S&P told CNBC. "Many people, including Standard & Poor's economists, expect further declines in home prices throughout the year. They're looking for the bottom to go through the end of the year and turn around in 2008."


Here is the difference between this index and the price data in the post two posts below:

The S&P/Case-Shiller index and another by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight track the same home over time and more accurately reflect price trends, economists said.

Gauges from the Commerce Department and the National Association of Realtors can be influenced by changes in the types of homes sold. Higher sales of cheaper homes relative to more-expensive properties will bias the figures down.


This index makes a heck of a lot more sense given the current inventory glut in existing homes.

Credit Card Defaults Increase

From CBS.Marketwatch

U.S. consumers are defaulting on credit-card payments at a significantly higher rate than last year, according to a Financial Times report citing Moody's data. Credit-card companies were forced to write off 4.58% of payments as uncollectable in the first half of 2007, almost 30% higher year-on-year, the report said. But Moody's said the rate of losses remained well below the 6.29% average seen in 2004, a year before the US enacted a new law that made filing for personal bankruptcy more onerous, the report said


Consider that news with the following three graphs from the St. Louis Federal Reserve.

Total household debt outstanding:



Year-over-year percentage change in household debt:



Household's debt service ratio:

Credit Card Defaults Increase

From CBS.Marketwatch

U.S. consumers are defaulting on credit-card payments at a significantly higher rate than last year, according to a Financial Times report citing Moody's data. Credit-card companies were forced to write off 4.58% of payments as uncollectable in the first half of 2007, almost 30% higher year-on-year, the report said. But Moody's said the rate of losses remained well below the 6.29% average seen in 2004, a year before the US enacted a new law that made filing for personal bankruptcy more onerous, the report said


Consider that news with the following three graphs from the St. Louis Federal Reserve.

Total household debt outstanding:



Year-over-year percentage change in household debt:



Household's debt service ratio:

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More