logo

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Gas Prices Fall For Another Week

From This Week in Petroleum

For the fourth consecutive week, the U.S. average retail price for regular gasoline decreased, falling 6.7 cents to 300.9 cents per gallon as of June 18, 2007. Prices are 13.8 cents per gallon higher than this time last year. All regions reported price decreases. East Coast prices dropped 4.6 cents to 297.6 cents per gallon. The largest regional decrease was in the Midwest, where prices fell 8.9 cents to 298.4 cents per gallon, while prices for the Gulf Coast decreased 5.9 cents to 290.3 cents per gallon. Rocky Mountain prices fell 4.4 cents to 318.1 cents per gallon but remain 33.8 cents per gallon above last year's price. West Coast prices were down 7.7 cents to 318.8 cents per gallon. The average price for regular grade in California was down 8.4 cents to 323.6 cents per gallon.


The good news in this report is gas and oil stockpiles are increasing. And gas production is finally at strong levels as well. However, gas demand is also 1.71% higher than the same time last year.

I doubt we're going to see gas prices drop much below last years levels at this point, which means consumers will get hit with high gas bills for the next 2-3 months. That means we could see a dent in lower-income based consumer behavior at stores like Wal-Mart an Dollar General.

Why the Bear Stearns Story is So Important

From Bloomberg:

``The real fear has to do with just how many other funds and warehouses could be in trouble,'' said Jeremy Shor, who oversees about $3 billion in asset-backed bonds as a portfolio manager at Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. in New York. A warehouse is a credit line extended to funds to buy the securities.


And that's where the real potential problem lies. I don't know why this story broke publicly. However, it did and it highlighted the problem with one hedge fund.

But this isn't the only fund out there. And the real question now becomes, "how many other problems are out there waiting to happen?"

FedEx Reports Earnings

From Reuters:

Package delivery company FedEx Corp. (FDX.N: Quote, Profile , Research) on Wednesday reported a profit and gave a quarterly forecast that missed expectations, citing slowing U.S. economic growth, but a solid full-year outlook sent its stock up more than 2 percent.

"The weakened industrial sector is currently limiting demand for transportation services," Chief Executive Officer Frederick Smith said in a statement. "But we expect the U.S. economy to begin to show modest year-over-year improvement in the late summer to early fall time frame."

The Memphis, Tn.-based company said net income for its 2007 fiscal fourth quarter ending May 31 rose 7 percent to $610 million, or $1.96 a share, compared with $568 million, or $1.82, a year earlier.


My guess is this is the blueprint for upcoming earnings releases. They will follow this blueprint:

1.) Earnings were a bit weaker than expected.
2.) Weaker earnings are to be expected when the economy hits a soft patch.
3.) Although earnings were weaker they are still positive, just not by as much as we would like.
4.) Things look like they are picking up.
5.) By the end of the year things should be fair to good.

Right now the evidence suggests a mild second part of the year. On the negative side we have housing and the trade deficit subtracting from growth. On the positive side we have consumer spending, an uptick in business activity and strong business real estate investment. Employment is fair but not great.

It's important to reiterate what this release says about Dow Theory. Dow theory says that transports and industrials have to confirm each other. If business is more profitable they will have to ship more stuff. The reverse is also true. FedEx is one of the largest shippers on the planet, so their earnings give us a good guide to what is happening in business. Fed Ex's net increase 7% -- not great, but not bad either. People are shipping, but not in as large a number as a few months ago.

From a market perspective, releases like this would indicate a range bound market, which would also coincide with the summer doldrums. Earnings aren't bad enough to sell, but not strong enough to buy.

Mortgage Market May Take A Big Hit This Week

Today's WSJ has an article the gives more detail about the Bear Stearns hedge fund that is having problems in its mortgage portfolio.

First, here's the root of this hedge fund's problems.

On Wall Street, the Bear Stearns hedge funds' problems point to another sensitive issue: Markets for exotic investments like derivatives linked to subprime mortgages have exploded in size in the past few years, but it is often hard to attach an accurate value to those assets.

Last month, Enhanced Leverage reported that its value fell 6.75% in April after the fund's bets on the mortgage market went wrong. Two weeks later, it put the loss at 18%, spooking already-nervous investors and creditors and sending many of them running for the exits.

The huge revision at least in part reflected conversations Bear Stearns hedge-fund managers had with bond dealers, three of which told them in late April that some of the funds' assets were worth less than the values stated on the funds' books, according to a person familiar with the matter.

......

Unlike stocks and Treasury bonds, whose prices are continually quoted and easily obtained, many of these derivative instruments trade infrequently and don't have clear market prices. To come up with market values for these investments -- a process known as "marking" their positions to market -- investment funds often rely on their own valuation models.


While the bond market is liquid -- that is you can usually buy and sell securities freely -- it's more of a market where the individual players negotiate price on a regular basis. When I was a bond broker, portfolio managers would call dealers every month to get a quote on all the bonds in their portfolio for end of the month pricing (I'm assuming this is still the practice, but I haven't been in the market for over 5 years so it could have changed). This means there wasn't a central market where managers could simply pull up a screen and get a market-wide accepted quote. As a result, bond portfolio values have some play in them.

Notice the huge drop in the value of Bear's portfolio holdings over a two-week period. The drop in value went from 6.75% to 18%. That's a really big drop.

"There's some real concern about how realistic dealer quotes are," said Andrew Lo, a finance professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who is also a principal in AlphaSimplex Group LLC, an asset-management company that also runs a hedge fund. "You're talking about quotes during normal times that are very different from quotes during stress times."

There is no indication that Bear Stearns's fund managers sought to mislead lenders or investors about the value of the funds. Indeed, the firm's approach to valuing its securities seems to be in line with guidelines set up by Moody's Investors Service, which evaluates hedge-fund practices. But the crisis does point to the kinds of valuation problems hedge funds and their investors or lenders can run into, even when they follow sound practices.

A forced sale of the Bear Stearns funds' assets now could trigger a broader repricing of mortgage-backed bonds and lead to losses and margin calls -- demands for additional cash or collateral -- at other funds. That prospect might have given some of Bear Stearns's lenders, which include Merrill, Citigroup Inc. and Barclays PLC of Britain, an incentive to help out the funds. But Merrill and others decided to bail out of the funds yesterday.


These paragraphs are very important.

1.) There doesn't appear to be any deliberate wrongdoing.
2.) Hedge Funds were pricing their securities based on a liquid market that had confidence in the value of the securities it traded. Now it appears that model was too optimistic when it came to the actual value of the bonds it traded.
3.) Because Bear is selling the underlying securities over the next few days, the market will get actual prices from buyers and sellers. These will be far more accurate than the prices based on models.
4.) The prices Bear gets for the bonds it sells may be below the prices on the books.
5.) This could force other hedge fund to reprice their mortgage portfolios at lower prices.
6.) If the repricing is severe other hedge funds could have the same problems that Bear is having, essentially creating a ripple effect throughout the industry.

I want to caution on a few points:

1.) This is not financial Armageddon. Securities markets are incredibly resilient and are almost always able to deal with stressful events like this.
2.) That being said, this could be an incredibly stressful event for all the players involved.
3.) We had the sub-prime shakeout earlier this year. A ton of sub-prime players went belly-up or sold portfolios. This could be the beginning of a shake-up in the hedge fund industry with similar results. We're going to have to watch this situation very carefully to see what happens.

The Eagle Has Landed

The Eagle Has Landed
Barclays is to abandon its centuries old eagle logo, if the deal with ABN Amro the Dutch bank goers through.

It seems that the eagle, that has adorned Barclays letterheads, branches and all corporate communications since the 1600's has been deemed by the Dutch to be too reminiscent of the Nazi eagle for their taste.

Seemingly Barlcays will work on a new corporate logo, should the deal go through, sans eagle; probably the ABN Amro shield.

Barclays claim that the UK logo will remain the same.

I can't see that being a very bright or practical idea, as it will cause brand confusion and dilute the Barclays image and brand.

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

Merrill Will Sell MBS

From the WSJ:

A day after managers of a troubled internal hedge fund at Bear Stearns Cos. presented lenders with a last-ditch plan to reinvigorate the fund with additional financing, creditor Merrill Lynch & Co. pushed forward with plans to sell hundreds of millions of dollars in collateral assets out of the fund, said traders late Tuesday.

Merrill has indicated plans to sell off at least $850 million worth of collateral assets, mostly mortgage-related securities, Wednesday afternoon, according to documents reviewed by the Wall Street Journal. Those plans come amid efforts by the Bear fund managers to stave off liquidation by lining up $1.5 billion in new credit from parent company Bear Stearns and an additional $500 million in new equity capital. The managers spent Tuesday trying to finalize those financing arrangements.

An auction Wednesday could come as a blow to the fund, known as the High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies Enhanced Leverage Fund, because it could spur additional sales of collateral assets from other worried dealers. A string of asset seizures would likely force the dissolution of the fund, and could effectively drag down the prices of similar securities in the market, creating losses at other Wall Street firms. On the other hand, a handful of successful trades might still pull the troubled fund out of harm's way, and Merrill could yet change its plans, as it has done once before.


Merrill is one of the primary broker dealers that deal directly with the government. That means their trading desk is large and very connected. Right now there are tons of calls going out to accounts about this sale.

However, it could also backfire on Merrill if they don't get the prices they want. If that happens, expect problems to ripple through the mortgage markets.

Best Buy's Net Income Drops 18%

From the AP


Profit for the quarter ended June 2 dropped to $192 million, or 39 cents per share, from $234 million, or 47 cents per share, in the same period a year ago.

Revenue rose 14 percent to $7.93 billion, from $6.96 billion last year.

Analysts polled by Thomson Financial expected a profit of 49 cents on revenue of $7.85 billion.

Same-store sales, or sales in stores open at least 14 months, grew 3 percent during the quarter.


Increasing revenue + decreasing net income = margin compression. This means the company is making less money on what it sells. Compressing margins means the company has less room for internal error. It also means the company has work to do because from the company's perspective it is selling the wrong mix of products.

This is not a conscious effort from consumers; they are not going into the store and saying to themselves, "I want to buy products that make Best Buy less money." What's happening is consumer's tastes and preferences are changing to items that make the company less money. Now the ball is in Best Buy's court to find a mix of products that increases their margins.

The reason for following Best Buy is simple: they are the largest consumer electronics store by a large margin. Their market capitalization is $22.9 billion and their next largest competitor is Gamestop at $6.2 billion. In other words, BBY dominates the industry, so their overall fortunes give a strong indication of what may be happening in this industry. It also gives us an idea of what may be happening with the consumer.

Housing Starts Drop

From Bloomberg:

Housing starts in the U.S. fell in May, signaling the slump in home construction will continue to depress growth.

Builders broke ground on new houses at an annual rate of 1.474 million, down 2.1 percent from 1.502 million the prior month, the Commerce Department said today in Washington. Building permits rose 3 percent to 1.501 million from 1.457 million.

Lower prices and more incentives have failed to spur interest as buyers wait for even bigger bargains, leaving builders with a glut of unsold properties. A jump in mortgage rates and stricter rules to qualify borrowers with poor credit ratings, known as subprime customers, may reduce demand even more in coming months, economists said.

``There is still some more downside to the housing market,'' said Nariman Behravesh, chief economist at Global Insight Inc. in New York. ``Mortgage rates started up again and there is still a shakeout going on in subprime.''


Here's a chart of housing starts. Notice that although this months figures were down, total starts have stabilized over the last 5 months at 1.4 - 1.5 million/year. That does not mean housing starts will stay at these levels. But for now the market has found equilibrium.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Oil Prices Fall From Highs

From Bloomberg:

Crude oil fell from near a nine-month high in New York as some traders speculated recent gains that followed unrest in Nigeria were unjustified.

Nigeria's two main oil unions said yesterday they planned to join a general strike scheduled to start tomorrow. In addition, Chevron Corp. and Eni SpA reported raids on facilities in the West African nation, Africa's biggest oil producer.

``How much these situations are priced in is hard to measure,'' said Wolfgang Kraus, chief energy and commodities trader at BayernLB in Munich. ``The fact is that the market is willing to react to negative headlines, so the risk is there.''

Crude oil for July delivery fell as much as 35 cents, or 0.5 percent, to $68.74 a barrel in after-hours electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. It traded at $68.75 at 9:24 a.m. in London. The contract jumped $1.09, or 1.6 percent, to $69.09 a barrel yesterday, the highest close since Sept. 1 and the fourth straight day of gains.


It's been awhile since we've looked at the oil chart, so let's see what the chart says.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

The most striking feature of this chart is the two and a half month consolidation that occurred between roughly $61 and $67. Anytime you see a channel that is anywhere up to about 10%, think consolidation channel/forming a base (10% is simply a best guess rule of thumb). That's exactly what he have here.

Let's pull the lens back to the weekly chart to see what it looks like.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Notice he have an upside down head and shoulders formation forming since October of last year. In addition, the recent consolidation occurred just above the head and shoulder's neckline. And we have the 20 day SMA just about to cross the 50 day SMA. In other words, we've got a lot of technical reasons for the market to move higher or remain at these levels.

All of this occurred right before the summer driving season. We also know from the Department of Energy that gasoline demand is up and refineries are just now getting up to snuff for gasoline production. And while gas prices have fallen for the last three weeks, they are still 17 cents above year-ago levels.

On top of this, recent price increases are due to geopolitical tensions -- another wild card in the oil market.

So, we have strong fundamental reasons for oil to remain at these levels plus strong technical reasons for oil to remain at these levels.

What Use Are Consultants?

Waste

Those of you who ever wondered what use consultants are, and whether they really represent value for money, should take heart from the findings of the all party Public Accounts committee.

The committee has lambasted the government's waste of £2BN per annum on external consultants, deriding it as "sheer profligacy".

The committee said that given such amounts of expenditure it was "impossible to believe that the public are receiving anything like full value for money".

In 2005-06 the public sector in England spent approximately £2.8BN on consultants, a staggering increase of 33% pct over the previous three years, with central government accounting for £1.8BN.

The bulk of the increase came from higher spending by the National Health Service.

Quote:

"Central government is repeatedly using consultants for core skills, including project and programme management and IT, and is increasingly turning to a select list of suppliers."

Committee chairman Edward Leigh said:

"Departments are often on the phone to consultants without first finding out whether their own in-house staff have the skills to do the job.

Departments routinely do not agree with the consultants any measurable benefits to be expected from the contracts. And consultants are often paid simply on the basis of the amount of time worked and not on what the work has achieved.

What would we say of anyone in private life who dealt with contractors like this? The consultancy firms are truly on to a good thing.

It is impossible to believe that the public are receiving anything like full value for money from this expenditure. In fact, a good proportion of it looks like sheer profligacy
."

Quite!

The consultants know that with this government, they have a prone cash cow begging to be milked to death; the government know that they need not worry about funding the bill, as all they have to do is raise taxes.

Everyone's a winner, except for the taxpayer!

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More