logo

Showing posts with label administration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label administration. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Deal Agreed For Farepak Victims

The long suffering victims of the Farepak debacle (the Christmas savings club that collapsed in 2006) have finally had some reasonably "good" news.

They will end up receiving a total of 50p for every £1 that they saved with the company. Final payments will be made in August.

Suzy Hall, national campaign co-ordinator of victim group Unfairpak, is quoted in the Guardian:
"This is a much better outcome than we expected – to get 50p overall when we started with nothing in the pot, and then [were offered] just 4p for every £1. 

I'm extremely happy."

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Setanta

Setanta, the over hyped sports channel, went off the air last night at 6PM when it went into administration.

Despite the fact it was long teetering on the edge of administration, it happily continued advertising right up to the bitter end. Quite what happens to the subscriptions of those foolish enough to have bought into the hype in the few days before it went bust is not clear.

In theory, if they bought via credit card, they should have nothing to worry about as card companies offer insurance for just such occurrences. However, some credit card companies are more than happy to look for any excuse to not pay up; the fact that it was obvious that Setanta was going into administration may provide them with just such an excuse.

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

The Ring of "Strength"

The Times reports that the Icelandic company Baugur (which means "Ring of Strength") is about to fall into administration.

Baugur owns/controls a number of UK retail companies including Iceland, Hamleys, House of Fraser, Goldsmiths, Mappin and Webb, Principles and Whistles.

The move to administration has been brought about by the collapse of talks with Landsbanki, an Icelandic bank, over restructuring Baugur's £1BN debts.

A classic example of the dangers expanding too fast using other people's money.

Monday, January 5, 2009

Waterford Wedgewood Collapses

The "real" economy is now feeling some very "real" pain from the banking crisis. It was announced today that Waterford Wedgewood will be placed into administration, thus threatening 1,900 jobs in the UK.

Waterford Wedgwood missed a January 2 deadline to meet loan repayments. Its net debts are around Euro449M, and it had been unable to raise Euro150M of new equity.

The company had been making losses for the last six years.

As ever, it will be the fundamentals that determine which companies survive this recession (now that the era of "easy" money has ended); ie profits and cash flow.

Monday, December 8, 2008

The Trillion Dollar Plan

Good luck to President elect Obama and his trillion dollar plan.

The money may well help ease the recession, if it is carefully targeted. However, the key to kick starting economic recovery is confidence.

Fortunately Obama is starting from a very good position, as no one (at this stage) believes that he will be worse than the outgoing administration wrt competence.

Monday, December 1, 2008

London Scottish Fails

London Scottish Bank (LSB) went into administration this morning.

LSB specialises in offering fixed rate savings accounts and loans to customers with poor credit histories.

Its structure was somewhat top heavy, it had only 10,000 savers, £250M in deposits but employed 700 people.

In the six months to April 2008, it made a loss of £7.4M.

The Treasury issued a statement guaranteeing all deposits (even those above the FSCS £50K limit):

"The Chancellor has put in place arrangements to ensure that all eligible retail depositors in London Scottish Bank will receive their money in full, including those with balances above the current 50,000 pound FSCS limit."

Shares were suspended at 2.62p.

Thursday, November 27, 2008

Woolworths In Administration

As expected, Woolworths is now in administration. Deloittes, who are acting as administrators will keep the stores open and pay staff in the period up to Christmas; there are expressions of interest in the company.

However, this sorry state of affairs could have been avoided if certain lenders had not blocked the company's plans for selling the retail unit to Hilco.

The lenders who blocked the plans included Barclays, and Bank of Ireland subsidiary Burdale Financial.

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Woolies Suspended

The Times reports that shares in Woolworths have been suspended at 1.22p this morning, as the company attempts to conclude talks to sell its 840 store retail business.

Hilco are understood to be prepared to buy the retail division for £1. However, the banks that Woolies owes money to are less than happy with the possible losses arising on such a deal.

Added to the problems that Woolies faces, in trying to secure a deal, is funding the wage bill and continuing to trade "solvently". The directors are under a legal obligation to trade solvently, in the event that Woolies becomes "insolvent" (ie the banks refuse to provide any more working capital) then the company will be forced into administration thus threatening 30,000 jobs.

In the "good old days" of "privately" owned banks (ie before the banks went cap in hand to the government for a bailout) the banks would have only themselves and their "consciences" to answer to wrt pushing a company in administration.

However, now that they are semi nationalised, for them to force 30,000 people onto the dole queue in this manner would be a tad "politically unwise" to say the least.

That being said the banks are very capable of making a very foolish decision and consigning Woolies to the dustbin of history, were they to do so they would be signing their own death warrants.

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Kick Starting The Mortgage Market

The ongoing mortgage drought has caused pain not just to those seeking to borrow, but also those wishing to lend (less loans means less commission and less interest).

Finally those in the mortgage industry appear to be waking up to the fact that they need to do something about this mess. The Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) want to free up UK banks and building societies to offer new home loans, to do this it wants the Bank of England to guarantee a market in mortgage-backed securities and covered bonds.

The CML claims that the key issue is the lack of available funding to support new mortgage lending, the proposal would cover new mortgages.

"The CML firmly believes that with quick and decisive implementation of the mortgage market funding proposal, the Government could mitigate the difficulties that households and the housing market will otherwise face, as well as helping to restore greater confidence to the financial system as a whole."

A nice idea. However, I doubt that the government or Bank of England will rush to act on it.

Speed and decisiveness is not the hallmark of the current administration.

Monday, July 14, 2008

Ruined Reputations

The US, with characteristic speed and vigour, moved to steady the finances of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae yesterday.

The LA Times reported:

"Acting to prevent a severe disruption of the mortgage market, the federal government stepped in Sunday with plans for a sweeping aid package designed to bolster confidence in battered home-loan giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The Bush administration said it would ask Congress to authorize the Treasury Department to lend Fannie and Freddie more money than current limits permit and buy stock in the two companies.

Also Sunday, the Federal Reserve agreed to permit the companies to borrow directly from the central bank, as investment firms were allowed to do after the near-collapse of Bear Stearns Cos. in March. The money would tide Fannie and Freddie over while the administration and Congress rush the emergency measures through
."

This action provides an opportunity to reflect on what the British authorities and Bank of England would have done under similar circumstances. To some extent we already know, using Northern Rock as an example, they would have done very little and it would have been too late.

Our monetary authorities have been proven to be asleep at the wheel and, like rabbits frightened in the headlights, frozen with fear when confronted with a serious issue that needs resolute and muscular action.

As I recently noted, leading British banks have met with the Bank of England to ask for more help in stabilising the lending market; the £50BN injection, made earlier this year by the Bank of England, was simply not enough and the actions taken by the Bank and government since then have been too cautious and slow to have any meaningful impact on the confidence of the banks.

However, let me make it clear, whilst the inaction of the monetary authorities has contributed to this crisis the primary blame can be laid at the feet of our "respected" banks.

They willingly chose to buy and sell toxic sub prime debt from the US, in the hope that they could make a fast buck. The sub prime scheme was a classic pyramid selling scam, so long as you could keep selling the debt on without it crystallising the pyramid would keep growing. However, as with all pyramid scams, there is always an end.

Either the directors of our banks were incredibly stupid and did not know/understand what they were buying/selling (what were the risk and compliance departments doing during this period?), or they knowingly participated in the pyramid scam in the full knowledge that at some point it would collapse.

Either way, the reputation of the banks and those who run them has been ruined; it will take many years for the banks to restore their reputations.

The reputations of the British government, monetary authorities, financial services industry, City of London and banks have all been ruined by this scam.

Lessons will need to be learned and senior people removed from office if trust and confidence are ever to be restored.

Monday, July 30, 2007

The Metronet Debacle

It would appear that following on from the Metronet debacle, it is a case of once bitten twice shy.

That at least is the view of Terry Morgan, chief executive of the company responsible for maintaining and upgrading the Jubilee, Piccadilly and Northern lines, said he would not put Tube Lines at risk by simply taking on Metronet work.

"I think there's a number of things to happen yet," Mr Morgan said, referring to Metronet's decision to call in administrator Ernst & Young.

"First, someone has got to make certain it can't happen again. Tim O'Toole [London Underground managing director] and the mayor [Ken Livingstone] have made it clear there will have to be some changes with the way the Metronet contracts are let and London Underground will have to rescope the programme."

Source The Daily Telegraph

Thursday, July 19, 2007

The Price of The Metronet Failure

Gordon Brown has not escaped quite so cleanly, as he may have hoped, from the Metronet debacle.

Transport for London (TfL) has promised to stump up £750M to prevent the "meltdown" of London's primitive and shameful tube system, following on from yesterday's announcement by Metronet that they have placed themselves into administration.

Alan Bloom, an insolvency expert from Ernst & Young, has promised the hapless commuters of London who endure on a daily basis the third world tube system that he had an "overriding obligation" to ensure that the tube network does not grind to a halt.

Well, he would say that wouldn't he?

Ken Livingstone, Mayor of London, to his credit had resolutely opposed the PPP Metronet scheme. However, he was bulldozed out of the way by the "big clunking fist" aka Gordon Brown.

Chickens now are coming very firmly home to roost; and the Mayor has warned that the refitting of over 100 tube stations might have to be pushed back years, in favour of a multibillion-pound overhaul of the underground's signalling systems that Metronet was due to carry out.

Mayor Livingstone said that London now faced a "difficult period", while TfL tried to handle Metronet and "the clunking fist's" legacy of a £2BN cost overrun, a lending freeze from its banks and question marks over who inherits its two PPP contracts.

One has to ask some blindingly obvious questions:

1 How were things allowed to get to this stage in the first place?

2 Was no one overseeing this fiasco?

3 Who will be held to account?

4 What has the clunking fist got to say for himself now?

Needless to say, it will be the long suffering taxpayer who gets saddled with another one of this government's financial foul ups.

Tim O'Toole, a senior TfL executive and head of London Underground, said that he expected the taxpayer to plug any financial gaps left by the Metronet intervention.

"This will feed in with the larger discussion with the government about the funding of TfL and transport in London."

Quite!

The cash bung of £750M will be enough to cover Metronet's funding gap until the end of this year; after that...who knows?

By the way, the reason the clunking fist imposed PPP contract was to transfer the financial risk of managing public sector assets to the private sector.

Yes, you did read that correctly!

It would seem that the risk has been very speedily transferred back, which would indicate that PPP contracts are not worth the paper that they are printed on.

Well done Metronet and the clunking fist.

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Metronet Goes Into Administration

Metronet, the London Underground contractor, has announced that it will go into administration after overspending by a staggering £2BN; it has asked Mayor of London (Ken Livingstone) to appoint the administrator.

Alan Bloom, an insolvency specialist at Ernst & Young and the former administrator of Railtrack, is expected to be appointed to run Metronet.

Metronet said that its two Public Private Partnership contracts to renovate and maintain London's tube system were unsustainable. Its Metronet BCV programme, for the Bakerloo, Central and Victoria lines, had an unpluggable funding gap of just under £1BN. Metronet's creditors and shareholders – Balfour Beatty, WS Atkins, Bombardier, EdF and Thames Water – had refused to provide more funding.

Quote:

"Metronet Rail BCV requires additional funding to enable it to carry out its contractual obligations during the period of the Extraordinary Review.

This company has now established that it has no access to such further funds
."

The second contract, Metronet SSL, for London's sub-surface tube lines, has an an overspend of £1BN. Metronet said blamed the PPP regulator for not providing emergency funds for Metronet BCV.

Quote:

"Applying the logic of the PPP Arbiter's draft direction to the circumstances of Metronet Rail SSL, the Board of this infrastructure company has come to the conclusion that any application for Extraordinary Review... would come to a similar position."

The collapse of Metronet is a kick in the groin to the then chancellor, Gordon Brown, and his PPP policy. Brown bulldozed the tube PPP through despite strident objections from those who knew it would be a disaster.

Hardly surprising that he was so keen to become PM, thus avoiding the mess that he created.

The head of London Underground, Tim O'Toole, has assured Londoners that the service on the lines that Metronet is responsible– nine of the capital's 12 – will continue as normal.

Hardly much of a reassurance, given that the service is a shambles anyway.

We can expect this to be a shambles, not just for the current tube passengers but also for the Olympics 2012.

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

The End Game

The end of Paul Woilfowtiz's career as president of the World bank is now in sight, all that is happening now is an elaborate negotiation about the terms on which he should leave.

On Tuesday evening, after World Bank directors accused Wolfowitz of breaking ethics rules in negotiating a promotion and salary raise for his companion, Wolfowitz pleaded with them to give him another chance.

Wolfowitz urged directors to separate the specific mistakes he may have made in handling his companion's reassignment, and larger questions about his contentious two-year tenure at the bank.

"If you want to have a discussion about my leadership, my management style and the policies I support, let's do it.

That's fair. That's legitimate. But let's get past this conflict-of-interest matter that was resolved over a year ago
."

This last minute plea is unlikely to save him, as President Bush has now signalled that he is prepared to "allow" (in Bush's mind he has the power to keep Wolfowitz in situ - he does not) Wolfowitz to resign.

Bush has let it be known, that he would "allow" resignation if the bank board dropped its insistence to declare him unfit to remain in office.

However, as with many "new initiatives" and "changes of mind" that Bush proposes, this is too little too late. The majority of the countries who fund the bank are absolutely against allowing an easy opt out for Wolfowtiz, partly this being a reaction against Bush and his administration's unilateralism over the past 6 years.

It seems that the board will endorse the findings of a special committee that Wolfowitz broke bank rules, ethics and governance standards in arranging for, and concealing, a pay and promotion package for his companion, Shaha Ali Riza, in 2005.

Now is the time for Wolfowtiz to bring his lawyers in to discuss his severance package.

Another mess caused by the ineptitude of the Bush administration, that will have consequences for America's relationship with the rest of the world.

Friday, March 2, 2007

Mortgage Exit Fees

The hapless home owners, screwed by the endowment mortgage scandal and high mortgage exit fees, may be forgiven for thinking that the banks and loan companies merely regard them as a cash cow to be slaughtered for their personal consumption.

However, after some considerable pressure from the Financial Services Authority (FSA), there may at least be a some respite for those home owners who have suffered from unreasonably high mortgage exit fees.

In January, the FSA told lenders that they would need to justify raising mortgage "exit" fees.

The FSA said if they could not do so by 28 February, then they would have to agree to charge no fee at all, or keep with their original fee.

It seems that has produced a positive result. Robin Gordon-Walker, an FSA spokesman, said:

"Certainly the impression we are getting as we go through the responses is that most lenders have gone for the original mortgage exit administration fee option."

Many of the fees charged by lenders have doubled to between £200 and £300.

People who have paid the raised charges will now be able to go back to their former lenders, and ask for some of their money back.

Ray Boulger, from John Charcol, told the BBC:

"Around 10 million mortgages have been redeemed in the last four years.

But the number of people who claim compensation will no doubt be largely influenced by the amount of media coverage this topic receives.

However, I would estimate that the total compensation payable will be at least £50m and probably in the region of £100m
."

However, before people start popping champagne corks, remember that the banks and lenders will find other ways to part you from your cash.

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Administrations Jump

Deloittes have published figures that show a 26% jump in UK business administrations, when comparing 2006 with 2005.

Neville Kahn, reorganisation services partner at Deloitte, said:

"Many businesses have shown signs of distress over the past year. Our research shows that the worst hit were in the financial services, hospitality & leisure and recruitment and business support services sectors. The overarching theme of increased costs appears to have hit a large number of the businesses.

In the financial and recruitment sectors we have seen an increased regulatory burden and in hospitality & leisure - a typically high cost environment – we have seen businesses punished by their thin margins when volatility occurs. Overall, the figures suggest the economy is not as healthy as it might seem on the surface
."

The main sectors which saw increases in administration levels from 2006 to 2005 are:

-Recruitment and business support services saw an increase of almost 90%
-Hospitality and leisure businesses saw an increase of over 50%
-Financial services businesses saw in increase of nearly 50%

Lee Manning, reorganisation services partner at Deloitte, said:

"The costs associated with running an independent financial advisory business, such as FSA regulation and professional indemnity insurance, have increased significantly in recent years making it more difficult for the smaller businesses to absorb these costs."

Whether the culling of small firms is good news for the consumer is questionable.

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

FSA Calls For MEAF Refunds

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has called for lenders to justify, and refund, their increased mortgage exit administration fees (MEAF's).

MEAF's are charged by lenders when borrowers pay off their mortgage early, or switch to another lender. The theory is that the MEAF covers the administration costs of closing the mortgage early. However, the FSA and others are becoming increasingly suspicious of the recent MEAF increases being foisted on mortgage holders by some lenders.

The FSA stated that, with regards to current customers, lenders must decide by February 28th 2007, whether they will charge no MEAF, the original or revised lower MEAF or their current increased MEAF.

Those that decide to charge the latter will be required to justify their decision.

The FSA also stated that past customers, who are unhappy with their MEAF charges, must be treated in the same way as current customers. Those who complain about an increased MEAF, should expect a refund of the difference between the actual MEAF paid on exit and the original MEAF.

"This is Money" claims that some lenders, such as Alliance and Leicester, have trebled their original MEAF (Alliance and Leicester's now being £295).

No doubt the possibility of being able to make claims for excess MEAF's will bring about the creation of a whole new claims industry, who will live off other's misfortune.

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Financial Brokers Exposed

The Publican warns of two financial brokers who are scamming licensees:

"Gateway Finance.co.uk and Funds4Business, the brokers exposed by The Publican after ripping off licensees, are making it onto TV.

BBC South’s investigative programme Inside Out has been looking into their director Gary Thomas, and has interviewed victims of the financial broker.

The Publican unveiled the company in February 2005 following investigations, which revealed that licensees were left out of pocket after loans promised by the company failed to materialise. The company was also the subject of an investigation by The Mirror, following The Publican’s investigations.

Licensees claimed they had been promised a loan or mortgage, paid an administration fee of £350 and had not received the deal they have been promised.

Some have even paid arrangement fees of nearly £2,000 while others have paid for a valuations costing up to £1,600 and have still not been provided with the deal they were promised.

The programme will be shown on BBC 1 South Friday, January 26 at 7.30pm
".

Thursday, December 21, 2006

The Farepak Debacle III

The Farepak debacle is a story that simply won't go away, especially in the run up to Christmas.

The rival Christmas savings specialist Park Group Plc, which now that Farepak has collapsed is the UK's largest Christmas savings club, is claiming that they could have saved Farepak from collapse.

Managing Director, Chris Houghton, is quoted as saying:

"We made four (approaches) in 18 months. All at different times with different prices. We felt we'd made full offers for the business, and for some reason they did not want to take it."

Adding:

"We were bending over backwards to try to avoid the situation we've got now, but it ended up going into administration before we were able to get it done."

However, this claim is disputed; a spokesman for HBOS, bankers to Farepak's parent company European Home Retail (EHR) Plc, are claiming that EHR received no serious offers for the business.

Quote:

"The truth is that no realistic, viable deal was ever tabled.

If it had, EHR is a listed company it would have to be a matter of public record
."

All very well, but none of this helps the victims of Farepak's collapse.

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

The Farepak Debacle

The hapless victims of the Farepak collapse have had their hopes dashed of a pre Christmas settlement of the monies owed to them. Mr Justice Mann, a High Court judge, said yesterday that there were too many issues that were not fully resolved for him to be able to agree to a distribution of about £1M.

The £1M being the figure suggested by the administrators of the collapsed saving club company.

Mr Justice Mann said:

"It will doubtless seem to some that the points which currently seem to stand in the way . . . are technical and unmeritorious... They are real points, I fear, and they arise out of the way that this company conducted its business. They must be disposed of properly and on the basis of law, not purely on the basis of sympathy and Christmas."

The contentious point is the fact that money was paid into Farepak, between October 11 and October 13. The directors had internally decided to cease trading on 11 October. However, the company was not formally put into administration until October 13.

To add to the complexity of the case is the fact that people paid monies to around 26,000 agents, who would in turn would pass the money to the company at a later date.

Overall it is estimated that Farepak customers, many of whom are low income families, have lost around £40M.

In other Farepak news, PricewaterhouseCoopers have decided to go ahead with creditors' meetings for EHR (the parent company of Farepak) despite concerns that they will be swamped by Farepak customers.

PwC's meetings are not expected before Christmas.

As if to add to the misery of the Farepak customers, it is also reported that loan sharks are now targeting them; offering them financially suicidal loans.

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More