logo

Showing posts with label Royal Bank of Scotland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Royal Bank of Scotland. Show all posts

Friday, March 18, 2011

The "People's" Bank

Congratulations to the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), the 83% taxpayer owned bank, for once again proving that they are the "people's" bank.

Not only do they reward their CEO, Stephen Hester, with a "low" (his words, not mine) package of £7.7M but they also rewarded their top five non-board executives with £21M in total last year.

However, that is not an end to their largess, they also paid £375M to 323 key staff.

Proving that, so long as you are considered by RBS to be "key", that RBS is indeed the "people's" bank!

Thursday, December 3, 2009

The RBS Bonus Row

The row over the proposed bonus payments for RBS executives and management doesn't look like it's going to go away anytime soon.

RBS, the taxpayer owned (70%) wreck of a once fine bank, wants to pay its senior staff £1.5BN in bonuses this year (they are expecting to make £6BN in profits this year).

The government, playing to the gallery, has insisted that it has a say in how much should be paid and have threatened to veto it. The board, not unreasonably, point out that it is for them to make that judgement and have threatened to resign.

As ever with Brown and his lackeys, whatever they touch simply turns to shit. However, this is not the end of this farce.

Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary, has come out on the side of the board.

He is quoted in The Times:

"I understand the point of view that RBS directors are expressing. They have to remain competitive in the market in recruiting senior executives.

That is why it's important that all the banks are equally restrained and RBS is not singled out, but nobody is suggesting that that will happen
."

In other words, don't shoot yourself in the foot just to play to the gallery.

The trouble is, Brown loves to play to the gallery.

Monday, June 22, 2009

Government Headache

The government is learning that running a bank is not at all without its downsides.

This week the Royal Bank of Scotland, owned by the taxpayer, is expected to announce a £9.6M pay package for Stephen Hester, its CEO.

Whether Hester may, or may not, justify such a package will be an issue that will be buried in the headlines that instead will scream about the fact that the taxpayer is "footing the bill".

The sooner the government comes up with a clear plan as to how, and when, it will return its bank holdings to the private sector the sooner it will rid itself of what will become a very nasty headache for the PM and Chancellor (whoever they may be).

Monday, May 18, 2009

Shutting The Stable Door

The hapless and hopeless Financial Services Authority (FSA) has made another futile attempt to shut the stable door, on another of its regulatory failings, long after the horse has bolted.

PricewaterhouseCoopers has been called in by the FSA to investigate the conduct of former board directors of Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS).

The FSA wants to assess whether the RBS board, including former chief executive Sir Fred "The Shred" Goodwin (proud recipient of a £16M pension), behaved competently as the financial crisis destroyed the value of ordinary people's investments etc.

The FSA will examine whether the stock market was kept properly informed about the bank's financial position in the period surrounding its £12BN rights issue in the spring of 2008.

Too litte, too late!

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

RBS Trouble In Store

This Friday will see fireworks at the Royal Bank of Scotland's general meeting.

An RBS Shareholder Action Group has been set up by private shareholders, intent on bringing a class action against the company for allegedly misleading the shareholders over the state of the bank's finances when it made a rights issue in May 2008.

The new rights were issued at 200p, and are now trading under 20p.

The trouble with class actions brought by shareholders is that the only people who really benefit are the lawyers, the shareholders may well be angry (an indeed have a right to be angry) but by suing the company (in the guise of the board/previous board) they are in effect suing themselves.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Myners - A Lesson in Failure

Lord Myners attempted a bravura performance yesterday in front of the Treasury Select Committee, wrt their investigation into Sir Fred "The Shred's" RBS pension.

Unfortunately for Myners, he wasn't terribly convincing as he sought to deflect people's attention and pass the buck by saying (in a tone of "disgust") that the RBS Board had "bent over backwards" to reward Goodwin.

Other "playing to the gallery" quotes from Myners included gems such as:

-"beyond my comprehension"

-"extraordinary"

-"outrageous"

On listening to Myners one would be forgiven for thinking that he played no part in the affair whatsoever. Unfortunately for the hapless and hopeless peer of the realm, Myners had a very large role in the affair.

Myners admitted that he had been warned by Bob Scott ex head of RBS's remuneration committee that "The pension will be enormous, you know that".

Did Myners then, on being warned of this, ask how much the pension would be?

Can you guess the answer?

Yes that's right, Myners claims he didn't ask!

"I sought no information."

Either the man is lying, or else he is surely one of the most incompetent fools ever appointed to represent the taxpayer.

As Michael Fallon MP put it:

"Either you were party to very expensive back-scratching, or you neglected your duty to the taxpayer."

The bottom line is that Myners failed in his role, over such an obvious and easy target.

The question now is, given that the government failed in this relatively simple matter, what other horrors are lurking in the details of the bailouts that they have agreed to on our behalf?

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Lord Myners Grilled

Lord Myners is currently being grilled by the Treasury select Committee, wrt his role in the Sir Fred "The Shred" Pension issue.

A live feed of the session is available via The Times.

It is worth remembering that the details and timing of the leaks about Sir Fred's pension were highly convenient for the government, as it diverted people's attention away from Brown's role in creating the lax tripartite regulatory system that has undoubtedly contributed to this financial shambles.

Friday, March 13, 2009

Worse Than Worthless

Following on from yesterday's article about the FSA wanting people to be afraid of its powers, it would seem that it has much more work to do if its dream is to ever become reality.

The Times reports that the FSA blocked an attempt last April by institutional investors in Royal Bank of Scotland to vote against Sir Fred Goodwin.

The FSA veto of a proposal to put all RBS directors up for re-election ensured that Sir Fred did not have to stand.

It seems that the FSA was afraid that a mass rebellion against the board would have destabilised the bank.

This raises the question, that has been asked so many times before:

Who exactly does the FSA serve, the shareholders or the banks etc that pay its fees?

On the basis of the above it would seem very clear the FSA is beholden to its paymasters in the City, rather than those it is meant to serve and protect.

Nothing will change until the tripartite system is abandoned and a new regulatory regime created, whereby the FSA is radically restructured or abolished.

Thursday, February 26, 2009

RBS Breaks a Record

Congratulations to the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) for posting the largest loss in British corporate history (£24.1BN in 2008). Given the appalling state of its finances, RBS is to receive a further £25BN capital injection from the overworked British taxpayer, and will place £325BN of toxic "assets" in the government insurance programme.

Clearly RBS is following the old banking maxim that if you owe a small amount, the lender has you by the balls; whereas if you owe a large amount, you have the lender by the balls.

Needless to say the dire situation which RBS has placed itself in threatens many of the jobs of its employees. However, one man who seems to be doing OK is its ex CEO Sir Fred "The Shred" Goodwin, who is currently receiving a pension of £650K per annum (despite being only 50).

Unsurprisingly Alistair Darling is a tad peeved at RBS for treating Goodwin so generously, and even more peeved at Goodwin for taking the money. In fact Darling was so peeved, that he sent Lord Myners to have a word with Goodwin about the wisdom of taking the money.

Darling is still waiting for an answer.

Monday, February 9, 2009

Barclays Uses Commonsense

Not all banks have their heads up their own backsides, when it comes to bonuses and the public perception of failure and greed.

Barclays today announced a profit of £6.1BN (after £8.1BN of write downs), ahead of forecasts but 14% below last year. Barclays also announced that it would not be paying bonuses to its executive directors, and only pay bonuses to those below board level.

A wise and sensitive political decision, all the more so because the government does not have a stake in Barclays. The Royal Bank of Scotland would be wise to take note of this.

Friday, February 6, 2009

Bank Of England Cuts Rates Again

The Bank of England cut rates again yesterday (from 1.5% to 1%), in another attempt to draw a red line under the recession and falling confidence.

Not a moment too soon, judging by the report in the Times that notes that the number of businesses filing for administration (after adjustments for one multi operation failure) in the last quarter of 2008 was 1,289 (a rise of 124%).

However, the Bank of England knows that the rate cuts are meaningless, if banks continue to provide the lifeline of loans and finance to struggling businesses and individuals. To this end it is clear that quantitative easing (ie printing money) is necessary, and will have to be implemented soon.

In other news I am pleased to see that RBS have been reading this site:

Quote:

"I wonder how many of the RBS board will resign for their folly, end eschew generous payoffs?"

RBS have just axed 7 non executive directors, in an attempt to distance itself form those who brought about its destruction.

Quite why RBS needed so many NEDs (given that they allowed Fred "The Shred" and his acolytes to destroy the bank - ie did nothing) remains a mystery.

They would have been well advised to read my advice about the role of NED's, published in 2003. RBS might have been been saved, had they followed that advice.

Thursday, February 5, 2009

Pigs At The Trough

The management of the Royal Bank of Scotland, bailed out by the taxpayer to the tune of £20BN, isn't going to allow anything as inconvenient as gross incompetence (it is expected to announce a loss of £7BN-£8BN for 2008) to get in the way of its bonus payments.

The Times reports that RBS is planning to pay large bonuses to thousands of its City traders and senior bankers. Some of the payments are expected to reach tens of millions of pounds, with some bankers in line for six-figure payouts.

It seems that the culture of arrogance is alive and well at RBS, despite the fact that the management should hang their heads in shame for destroying one of Britain's leading banks.

Lord Mandelson, Business Secretary, put it rather more diplomatically then myself (however, it is clear that he is not best pleased):

"What I would say is please be mindful about how this looks and what public opinion will be.

Obviously you have to work in a market where you have got to recruit the best people, keep the best people in place and motivate them.

But they have also got to consider how it looks and how it seems when those mistakes and losses have been made
."

Monday, January 19, 2009

RBS In Deep S**t

It is fair to say that the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) has placed itself in a very deep pile of s**t. RBS announced today that its losses (due to be formally announced in February) could hit £28BN, partly due to its bizarre decision to spend billions acquiring ABN Amro last year. ABN Amro had exposure to US sub-prime mortgages, and invested directly in the American home loan market.

One wonders quite why RBS thought that this was such a great deal at the time, and whether the board had any real understanding of what was happening in the market.

Gordon Brown chose to vent his spleen on the subject (a political ploy no doubt, but it will resonate with the public), as per The Times:

"Yes, I'm angry about what happened at the Royal Bank of Scotland.

Now we know that so much was lost in sub-prime loans in the US and now we know that some of that was related to the purchase of ABN Amro, I think people have a right to be angry that these write-offs are happening and that these write-offs were caused by decisions that were made about international investments that were clearly wrong investments
."

Despite being angry, Brown will increase the government's stake (ie ours) in RBS from 58% to 70%.

I wonder how many of the RBS board will resign for their folly, end eschew generous payoffs?

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

The Bankers Strike Back

The major high street banks, never fearful of damaging their already trashed reputations, will go to the Court of Appeal today in a bid to overturn the High Court ruling that unauthorised overdraft charges are unlawful.

The banks lodging the appeal include; Abbey, Barclays, Clydesdale, HBOS, HSBC, Lloyds TSB, Nationwide and the Royal Bank of Scotland.

Whatever the outcome, not expected to be decided for quite some time, the banks will ensure that they make money out of their customers one way or another. In the event they lose the appeal, they will simply abolish free current accounts.

It's as simple as that!

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Banks Speed Up - Sort Of

A rare piece of good news for bank customers whereby the banks, whose reputation has sunk to an all time low, have actually started to do something the benefits their long suffering customers.

A banking scheme for one-day cash transfers over the phone or on the internet has started.

This is designed to speed up the process of transfers, which previously took up to four days.

Can you guess what happened to the money being transferred during this four day period?

It earned the banks a very nice £30M in interest per annum.

How nice for them!

Under the new scheme customers will be able to make one-off payments, up to a maximum value of £10K, over the telephone or via the internet. These payments will leave their account and arrive at the destination account on the same day.

The 13 banks included in the scheme are: Abbey, Alliance and Leicester, Barclays, Citi, Clydesdale and Yorkshire Banks (National Australia Group), Co-operative Bank, HBOS, HSBC, Lloyds TSB, Nationwide Building Society, Northern Bank (Danske Bank), Northern Rock, and Royal Bank of Scotland Group (including NatWest and Ulster Bank).

I wonder what the catch is?

Friday, May 23, 2008

Banks To Appeal

Eight leading street banks, including Barclays, HSBC and Royal Bank of Scotland, have sought permission to appeal against last month's ruling which gave the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) legal jurisdiction to determine whether bank charges are unfair.

If permission is granted bank customers, who have submitted claims for "rip off" fees, may have to wait years to receive their compensation.

Needless to say, there have been accusations that the banks are using this appeal to delay repaying customers.

Phil Jones of Which?, is quoted in The Times:

"The banks should stop stringing this out. The charges are seen as unfair by consumers so they should do the decent thing and pay compensation to those who have made a claim and reduce the fees to a fair level."

Whatever the outcome, one thing is for certain, the banks will find other ways to charge their customers. The most likely change will be an introduction of charges on all current accounts, whether they are in credit or not.

Banks are not charities!

Thursday, May 8, 2008

Banks Raise Fees

As I predicted, the banks will not accept the possibility of a cap to their overdraft charges.

As such they are raising the the monthly fees on accounts, by up to 20%, before the ruling by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) that could cap overdraft charges.

The Times estimates that approximately 7 million customers will be adversely affected by this move.

Royal Bank of Scotland, NatWest and Lloyds TSB will all raise their fees on the "packaged" accounts (ie ones that offer "extras" such as insurance).

Needless to say, next in line will be the free current accounts currently offered by the banks.

As I have repeated, time and time again on this site, banks are not charitable institutions. Block their revenue stream in one direction, and they will find a way around that blockage.

However, quite why people sign up to the "packaged" accounts is a mystery to me; they offer no tangible value for money, most certainly not after this round of price increases.

Dump them!

Monday, January 14, 2008

High Noon

Today marks high noon for the banks, as the the much vaunted court case begins that will determine the legality and fate of bank charges for unauthorised overdrafts.

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) is seeking to prove that bank charges fall under the remit of consumer contracts regulations, which state that "penalty fees" must be proportionate to their cost. The banks claim that the charges, of £30 for bouncing a cheque or exceeding an overdraft limit, are not punitive and so do not fall under the terms of the act.

In the event that the OFT wins, it will begin a second case aiming to prove that fees levied on customers are too high because they exceed costs of £4 a transaction.

If the banks win, they will continue charging customers with impunity.

However, in a perverse twist, whatever the outcome of the case customers can still claim back late payment fees on credit cards of more than £12.

The banks going to court today are Abbey National, Barclays, Clydesdale, HBOS, HSBC, Lloyds TSB, Royal Bank of Scotland Group and the Nationwide Building Society. They have every reason to fight, as they make around £3.5BN per annum from these charges and stand to repay consumers £5BN if they lose.

However, whatever the outcome, you can be assured that the hapless consumer will be charged one way or another by the banks.

Thursday, September 13, 2007

Bank Charges

As the date for the court appearance by eight banks, who will be taken to court in January by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) for allegedly unfair bank charges, draws ever nearer; some banks are trying to show "some flexibility" in their approach to their customers.

Thisismoney reports that Lloyds will be the first bank to reduce its overdraft charges.

Quote:

"On November 2 Lloyds will introduce a monthly charge of £15 and a sliding scale of daily charges of between £6 and £20 instead of its previous daily charge of £30 for unauthorised overdrafts."

Whether this mollifies the OFT, or is the start of a price war between the banks, remains to be seen.

The list of shame includes; Lloyds, Abbey, Barclays, Clydesdale Bank, Natwest and its owner HBOS, HSBC, The Royal Bank of Scotland and Nationwide Building Society.

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

HBOS Loses Customer Data

HBOS's reputation for professionalism has taken another knock, as it emerged that it has lost a disc holding confidential data on 62,000 HBOS banking group mortgage customers.

As if this were not embarrassing enough, it transpires that the disc was not encrypted.

One wonders quite what their internal audit and IT departments are being paid for, if they do not have procedures in place to ensure that confidential data held on discs is encrypted as a matter or course.

Regrettably, for HBOS, this was not the first time that it has lost customer data. There was also a loss of data in March, we are assured that the second loss was "unrelated" because the data had gone missing in a different way.

So that's alright then!

This month's data breach included names, addresses, dates of birth and mortgage account numbers on a CD-ROM sent by HBOS subsidiary Bank of Scotland to a credit reference agency. It was reported missing when the agency did not receive the expected monthly dispatch of information.

The lost data would enable any self respecting fraudster to have a "jolly time" doing what he does best, namely perpetrate identity theft.

An HBOS spokesperson said:

"The disc would usually be encrypted.

Unfortunately, due to human error on this occasion the usual policy was not followed. We apologise to our customers for this
."

As if this were not bad enough HBOS, for some unknown reason, chose to send the data via the Royal Mail's ordinary service rather than a secure service. This invites theft, as the Royal Mail is notoriously prone to theft and losses.

HBOS said:

"That was a mistake on our part."

Quite!

In March, Halifax building society, another HBOS subsidiary, lost a printout containing data on 13,000 mortgages from an employee's car.

HBOS general manager for group communications, Shane O'Riordain, at the time said:

"Lessons have been learned. We are reviewing our procedures as a matter of urgency."

This was the same month in which HBOS, along with 11 banks, was ordered by the information commissioner to sign a formal undertaking to comply with Data Protection Act principles, after dumping customers' personal data in rubbish bins outside their premises.

HBOs now claim the following:

"Lessons have been learned and we have revised our procedures accordingly," he said. "The other incidents ... are all unrelated. One was the theft of a briefcase from an employee (which has been recovered) and the undertaking referred specifically to the disposal of confidential waste."

Given that banks are forever lambasting their customers over their handling of passwords and personal data, this series of events is pretty pathetic.

Sauce for the goose is evidently not sauce for the gander.

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More