A Closer Look At the QQQQs

Tech has been "the" market of late, so it seems appropriate to look at the daily and monthly charts to get an idea for what is in store for the market.



The daily chart is very bullish.

1.) There is s strong uptrend in place that started about 2 1/2 months ago.

2.) All the moving averages are moving higher.

3.) The shorter moving averages are above the longer moving averages.

4.) Although the RSI and MACD are high, both have some upside room to move. Considering the Fed just cut rates this seems possible.



The weekly chart also has some very bullish points.

1.) Note the series of higher highs and higher lows. This is what a classic bull market chart should look like.

2.) The shorter SMAs are higher than the longer SMAs.

3.) All three SMAs are pointing higher.

4.) The only problem is from the technical indicators which are giving overbought indicators. Remember this is not fatal and it does not mean the market is going to drop. It could mean a period of consolidation.

The weekly chart gives us some pause, as it indicates consolidation might be on the horizon. However, with the rate cut, that consolidation might not last to long.

Read More

A Closer Look At the QQQQs

Tech has been "the" market of late, so it seems appropriate to look at the daily and monthly charts to get an idea for what is in store for the market.



The daily chart is very bullish.

1.) There is s strong uptrend in place that started about 2 1/2 months ago.

2.) All the moving averages are moving higher.

3.) The shorter moving averages are above the longer moving averages.

4.) Although the RSI and MACD are high, both have some upside room to move. Considering the Fed just cut rates this seems possible.



The weekly chart also has some very bullish points.

1.) Note the series of higher highs and higher lows. This is what a classic bull market chart should look like.

2.) The shorter SMAs are higher than the longer SMAs.

3.) All three SMAs are pointing higher.

4.) The only problem is from the technical indicators which are giving overbought indicators. Remember this is not fatal and it does not mean the market is going to drop. It could mean a period of consolidation.

The weekly chart gives us some pause, as it indicates consolidation might be on the horizon. However, with the rate cut, that consolidation might not last to long.

Read More

I'm Not the Only One Calling Bulls^#$ on the GDP Inflation Number

It's good to know I'm not alone in my questioning the GDP deflator number.

From the Big Picture:

Price Indexes for Gross Domestic Product was an astounding low 0.8% (Table 4). In other words, this report benefited as much from higher inflation as it did from true growth.

I obviously take issue with that (as Crude Oil crosses $94 for the first time).

To highlight the impact that this 0.8% price gain had on the reported REAL GDP: that 0.8% gain matches a level last seen in 1998; prior to that, the previous deflator gain of .8% was n 1963.

Peter Boockvaar of Miller Tabak observes that "with the dramatic upturn in energy prices and other commodities, the decline in the Price Deflator is obviously unsustainable. The consensus today for Nominal GDP was 5.1% and came in today at 4.7%, thus weaker than expected. Q3 GDP was fine , but not as good as the headline report reads."

The average of the price index since Q1 2004 to Q2007 was 2.98, ranging froma low of 1.7% to a high of 4.2%. Thus, if the deflator matched consensus, it would have generated a GDP of 1.9%; if it was at its recent 3 year average of 2.98%, GDP would be ~1%.

A poster in the comments pointed me to this article from Marketwatch:

As odd as it sounds, the government reported that inflation was at a four-decade low in the third quarter, primarily because import oil prices rose so much.

If you don't understand that, welcome to the confusing world of national income accounting, where up sometimes is down, and where sometimes one plus one can equal zero.

The simple explantion:

Because of the way the government counts and reports the numbers, real-life inflation was understated and growth was overstated.

The economy didn't really grow 3.9%, and inflation really wasn't 0.8%. The numbers aren't as good as they look.

Read the whole thing.

Read More

I'm Not the Only One Calling Bulls^#$ on the GDP Inflation Number

It's good to know I'm not alone in my questioning the GDP deflator number.

From the Big Picture:

Price Indexes for Gross Domestic Product was an astounding low 0.8% (Table 4). In other words, this report benefited as much from higher inflation as it did from true growth.

I obviously take issue with that (as Crude Oil crosses $94 for the first time).

To highlight the impact that this 0.8% price gain had on the reported REAL GDP: that 0.8% gain matches a level last seen in 1998; prior to that, the previous deflator gain of .8% was n 1963.

Peter Boockvaar of Miller Tabak observes that "with the dramatic upturn in energy prices and other commodities, the decline in the Price Deflator is obviously unsustainable. The consensus today for Nominal GDP was 5.1% and came in today at 4.7%, thus weaker than expected. Q3 GDP was fine , but not as good as the headline report reads."

The average of the price index since Q1 2004 to Q2007 was 2.98, ranging froma low of 1.7% to a high of 4.2%. Thus, if the deflator matched consensus, it would have generated a GDP of 1.9%; if it was at its recent 3 year average of 2.98%, GDP would be ~1%.

A poster in the comments pointed me to this article from Marketwatch:

As odd as it sounds, the government reported that inflation was at a four-decade low in the third quarter, primarily because import oil prices rose so much.

If you don't understand that, welcome to the confusing world of national income accounting, where up sometimes is down, and where sometimes one plus one can equal zero.

The simple explantion:

Because of the way the government counts and reports the numbers, real-life inflation was understated and growth was overstated.

The economy didn't really grow 3.9%, and inflation really wasn't 0.8%. The numbers aren't as good as they look.

Read the whole thing.

Read More

Fed Cuts And More on Inflation

I'm in the Charlotte, NC airport between flights. Thankfully I have a bit of time to stretch my legs after the two hour ride in the airplane cattle car.

Anyway, the Fed cut ates. Here is a link to the statement.

The Federal Open Market Committee decided today to lower its target for the federal funds rate 25 basis points to 4-1/2 percent.

Economic growth was solid in the third quarter, and strains in financial markets have eased somewhat on balance. However, the pace of economic expansion will likely slow in the near term, partly reflecting the intensification of the housing correction. Today’s action, combined with the policy action taken in September, should help forestall some of the adverse effects on the broader economy that might otherwise arise from the disruptions in financial markets and promote moderate growth over time.

Readings on core inflation have improved modestly this year, but recent increases in energy and commodity prices, among other factors, may put renewed upward pressure on inflation. In this context, the Committee judges that some inflation risks remain, and it will continue to monitor inflation developments carefully.

The Committee judges that, after this action, the upside risks to inflation roughly balance the downside risks to growth. The Committee will continue to assess the effects of financial and other developments on economic prospects and will act as needed to foster price stability and sustainable economic growth.

Let's look at this statement in a bit more detail.

Today’s action, combined with the policy action taken in September, should help forestall some of the adverse effects on the broader economy that might otherwise arise from the disruptions in financial markets and promote moderate growth over time.

It looks to me that the Fed is attempting to prevent further problems with this action. They are looking ahead and thinking there could be further problems. Their hope is liquidity will solve that problem.

Readings on core inflation have improved modestly this year, but recent increases in energy and commodity prices, among other factors, may put renewed upward pressure on inflation.

First -- recent increases in energy and commodity prices? Where have these guys been over the last few years? From now on, all Fed governors must demonstrate in a public forum that they can read a damn price chart.

This statement dovetails nicely with some comments I received in the previous post on 3Q GDP. Some people were wondering why I though the .8% chained deflator was too low and others offered to help find out what was wrong with the particular inflation number. All these comments are appreciated, BTW.

I have several problems with the inflation numbers -- most notably with the Fed's reliance on core inflation rather than overall inflation. In a period when food and energy prices are going though standard seasonal gyrations, the "we only watch core inflation" policy makes sense. However, we're not in that kind of environment right now. Largely thanks to India and China -- and their two billion or so residents who are seeing their incomes grow -- demand for commodities has really heated up. As a result we've seen a huge increase in commodity prices over the last 3-5 years.

Take a look at the following charts:

Oil (It should read a three-fold increase. Sorry -- airport blogging is a bit weird).



Agricultural prices:



Copper



Aluminum



All of these charts shows big price increases. And no -- this is not an ephemeral argument. Recent earnings releases from Kraft and P&G have both noted they are experiencing margin hits because of rising commodity prices. If the largest companies in their respective financial areas are experiencing price hits, then smaller companies that lack the bargaining power surely are experiencing worse.

Now -- back to today's .8% increase in the chained GDP deflator. Here is a chart from the current release the shows the previous increases from the respective previous quarter.



Now, let's ask a few questions that build on each other.

Does the .8% increase make sense in light of the previous quarters rate of growth? (This is is the previously mentioned Sesame Street test -- one of these things is not like the other one).

Especially in an environment when the economy is growing near full capacity (3.9%)?

In light of the above commodity charts that show commodity prices have been increasing for an extended length of time -- as in years?

At a time when productivity gains are shrinking?



I'm not saying the small gain isn't possible. But in light of all the previous questions -- especially multi-year increases in commodity prices and declining productivity -- the number just doesn't add up.

I should add -- as I hopefully always do -- I could be wrong in all of this. I've been wrong before and will be wrong again (I thought Madonna was going to be a one-hit wonder). But the number is just sticking in my craw as it were.

Read More

Fed Cuts And More on Inflation

I'm in the Charlotte, NC airport between flights. Thankfully I have a bit of time to stretch my legs after the two hour ride in the airplane cattle car.

Anyway, the Fed cut ates. Here is a link to the statement.

The Federal Open Market Committee decided today to lower its target for the federal funds rate 25 basis points to 4-1/2 percent.

Economic growth was solid in the third quarter, and strains in financial markets have eased somewhat on balance. However, the pace of economic expansion will likely slow in the near term, partly reflecting the intensification of the housing correction. Today’s action, combined with the policy action taken in September, should help forestall some of the adverse effects on the broader economy that might otherwise arise from the disruptions in financial markets and promote moderate growth over time.

Readings on core inflation have improved modestly this year, but recent increases in energy and commodity prices, among other factors, may put renewed upward pressure on inflation. In this context, the Committee judges that some inflation risks remain, and it will continue to monitor inflation developments carefully.

The Committee judges that, after this action, the upside risks to inflation roughly balance the downside risks to growth. The Committee will continue to assess the effects of financial and other developments on economic prospects and will act as needed to foster price stability and sustainable economic growth.

Let's look at this statement in a bit more detail.

Today’s action, combined with the policy action taken in September, should help forestall some of the adverse effects on the broader economy that might otherwise arise from the disruptions in financial markets and promote moderate growth over time.

It looks to me that the Fed is attempting to prevent further problems with this action. They are looking ahead and thinking there could be further problems. Their hope is liquidity will solve that problem.

Readings on core inflation have improved modestly this year, but recent increases in energy and commodity prices, among other factors, may put renewed upward pressure on inflation.

First -- recent increases in energy and commodity prices? Where have these guys been over the last few years? From now on, all Fed governors must demonstrate in a public forum that they can read a damn price chart.

This statement dovetails nicely with some comments I received in the previous post on 3Q GDP. Some people were wondering why I though the .8% chained deflator was too low and others offered to help find out what was wrong with the particular inflation number. All these comments are appreciated, BTW.

I have several problems with the inflation numbers -- most notably with the Fed's reliance on core inflation rather than overall inflation. In a period when food and energy prices are going though standard seasonal gyrations, the "we only watch core inflation" policy makes sense. However, we're not in that kind of environment right now. Largely thanks to India and China -- and their two billion or so residents who are seeing their incomes grow -- demand for commodities has really heated up. As a result we've seen a huge increase in commodity prices over the last 3-5 years.

Take a look at the following charts:

Oil (It should read a three-fold increase. Sorry -- airport blogging is a bit weird).



Agricultural prices:



Copper



Aluminum



All of these charts shows big price increases. And no -- this is not an ephemeral argument. Recent earnings releases from Kraft and P&G have both noted they are experiencing margin hits because of rising commodity prices. If the largest companies in their respective financial areas are experiencing price hits, then smaller companies that lack the bargaining power surely are experiencing worse.

Now -- back to today's .8% increase in the chained GDP deflator. Here is a chart from the current release the shows the previous increases from the respective previous quarter.



Now, let's ask a few questions that build on each other.

Does the .8% increase make sense in light of the previous quarters rate of growth? (This is is the previously mentioned Sesame Street test -- one of these things is not like the other one).

Especially in an environment when the economy is growing near full capacity (3.9%)?

In light of the above commodity charts that show commodity prices have been increasing for an extended length of time -- as in years?

At a time when productivity gains are shrinking?



I'm not saying the small gain isn't possible. But in light of all the previous questions -- especially multi-year increases in commodity prices and declining productivity -- the number just doesn't add up.

I should add -- as I hopefully always do -- I could be wrong in all of this. I've been wrong before and will be wrong again (I thought Madonna was going to be a one-hit wonder). But the number is just sticking in my craw as it were.

Read More

Quick Notes on GDP

I have about 10 minutes.

The overall GDP report is here

I have one big problem with this report. The GDP price deflator increased .8%? That is really low and just doesn't add up. The second lowest deflator over the last few years is 1.7 in the fourth quarter of 2006. Aside from that number and this month's number, most deflators are over 2% (see table IV in the link above). Playing the Sesame Street game "One of these things is not like the other one", that number should raise a ton of eyebrows.

Considering oil is near a record level, agricultural prices are in the middle of a multi-year bull run as are some metals, a deflator that low just doesn't add up.

Here's how the WSJ reported the inflation numbers from the report:

The price index for personal consumption expenditures rose by 1.7% after increasing 4.3% in the second quarter. But the much-watched PCE price gauge excluding food and energy accelerated, rising 1.8% after increasing 1.4% in the second quarter. Other price gauges in the report showed slowing inflation [BD's note -- really? Seen a chart of oil, agricultural or metals prices lately?], including the price index for gross domestic purchases, which measures prices paid by U.S. residents. It rose 1.6% after increasing 3.8%. The chain-weighted GDP price index increased 0.8% after increasing 2.6% in the second quarter.

Read More

Quick Notes on GDP

I have about 10 minutes.

The overall GDP report is here

I have one big problem with this report. The GDP price deflator increased .8%? That is really low and just doesn't add up. The second lowest deflator over the last few years is 1.7 in the fourth quarter of 2006. Aside from that number and this month's number, most deflators are over 2% (see table IV in the link above). Playing the Sesame Street game "One of these things is not like the other one", that number should raise a ton of eyebrows.

Considering oil is near a record level, agricultural prices are in the middle of a multi-year bull run as are some metals, a deflator that low just doesn't add up.

Here's how the WSJ reported the inflation numbers from the report:

The price index for personal consumption expenditures rose by 1.7% after increasing 4.3% in the second quarter. But the much-watched PCE price gauge excluding food and energy accelerated, rising 1.8% after increasing 1.4% in the second quarter. Other price gauges in the report showed slowing inflation [BD's note -- really? Seen a chart of oil, agricultural or metals prices lately?], including the price index for gross domestic purchases, which measures prices paid by U.S. residents. It rose 1.6% after increasing 3.8%. The chain-weighted GDP price index increased 0.8% after increasing 2.6% in the second quarter.

Read More

Traveling Day

I'm traveling today. I'll try and post on the market had Fed action,, but I can't guarantee anything.

Read More

Traveling Day

I'm traveling today. I'll try and post on the market had Fed action,, but I can't guarantee anything.

Read More

A Look At the Oil Market

This is a great example of a bull market chart. Notice the following.

1.) A series of higher highs and higher lows.

2.) The shorter simple moving averages (SMAs) are higher than the longer SMAs.

3.) All the SMAs are moving higher. That means the short (2 month), medium (2 1/2 month) and long term (40 week) trend is positive.

4.) Notice how prices have moved through previous highs over the last few months. These previous price levels also provide a ton of technical support when prices are decreasing, making it more difficult for prices to move lower.

5.) Although two technical indicators are at or near overbought levels (the RSI and MACD) that does not mean prices are going to drop. Notice from mid-September to mid-October that prices were also overbought and prices simply consolidated above previous highs. Overbought technical conditions can just as often lead to consolidation as a drop in bull markets.

6.) There are two upward sloping trend lines in place.

Today's WSJ has an article on the oil market that seems to inherently admit the "peak oil" argument. This argument states (essentially) that most or all of the world's oil has already been found and the world is at or near the highest level of oil production we'll see. Because I'm not a petroleum guy I can't speak to the veracity of these arguments (which isn't to say they aren't true). However, for more information, go to the Oil Drum website for some really good discussion on the matter.

From the WSJ article:

Several leading oil experts, gathered here yesterday for an annual energy conference, sketched a near-term future in which mounting global demand and shrinking supplies push oil prices well past the $100-a-barrel mark.

Consuming countries, they argued, will simply have to deal with the fact that new pockets of oil are getting far harder and more expensive to tap. That, combined with years of underinvestment by the industry, has led to a tapering off of new oil supplies that will continue for years, despite rising energy demand in Asia, the Middle East and some industrialized countries.

....

Sadad I. Al-Husseini, an oil consultant and former executive at Aramco, Saudi Arabia's national oil company, gave a particularly chilling assessment of the world's oil outlook. The major oil-producing nations, he said, are inflating their oil reserves by as much as 300 billion barrels. These amount to hypothetical reserves that are "not delineated, not accessible and not available for production."

A lot of production in the Middle East is from mature reservoirs, and the giant fields of the Persian Gulf region, he said, are 41% depleted.

Global oil and gas capacity is constrained by mature reservoirs and is facing a "15-year production plateau," Mr. Husseini said. He predicted that supply shortages will continue to add $12 to the price of oil for every million barrels a day in additional demand. Global demand, now at some 85 million barrels a day, was on average 10 million barrels a day lower in 1999.

.....

Andrew Gould, the chairman and chief executive of Schlumberger Ltd., an oil-services company, expressed similar concerns, noting that 70% of the oil fields that now quench world demand are more than 30 years old. The growth in global demand since 2003, he said, has been roughly the equivalent of the daily output from two of the world's larger suppliers: the North Sea and Mexico.

Read More

A Look At the Oil Market

This is a great example of a bull market chart. Notice the following.

1.) A series of higher highs and higher lows.

2.) The shorter simple moving averages (SMAs) are higher than the longer SMAs.

3.) All the SMAs are moving higher. That means the short (2 month), medium (2 1/2 month) and long term (40 week) trend is positive.

4.) Notice how prices have moved through previous highs over the last few months. These previous price levels also provide a ton of technical support when prices are decreasing, making it more difficult for prices to move lower.

5.) Although two technical indicators are at or near overbought levels (the RSI and MACD) that does not mean prices are going to drop. Notice from mid-September to mid-October that prices were also overbought and prices simply consolidated above previous highs. Overbought technical conditions can just as often lead to consolidation as a drop in bull markets.

6.) There are two upward sloping trend lines in place.

Today's WSJ has an article on the oil market that seems to inherently admit the "peak oil" argument. This argument states (essentially) that most or all of the world's oil has already been found and the world is at or near the highest level of oil production we'll see. Because I'm not a petroleum guy I can't speak to the veracity of these arguments (which isn't to say they aren't true). However, for more information, go to the Oil Drum website for some really good discussion on the matter.

From the WSJ article:

Several leading oil experts, gathered here yesterday for an annual energy conference, sketched a near-term future in which mounting global demand and shrinking supplies push oil prices well past the $100-a-barrel mark.

Consuming countries, they argued, will simply have to deal with the fact that new pockets of oil are getting far harder and more expensive to tap. That, combined with years of underinvestment by the industry, has led to a tapering off of new oil supplies that will continue for years, despite rising energy demand in Asia, the Middle East and some industrialized countries.

....

Sadad I. Al-Husseini, an oil consultant and former executive at Aramco, Saudi Arabia's national oil company, gave a particularly chilling assessment of the world's oil outlook. The major oil-producing nations, he said, are inflating their oil reserves by as much as 300 billion barrels. These amount to hypothetical reserves that are "not delineated, not accessible and not available for production."

A lot of production in the Middle East is from mature reservoirs, and the giant fields of the Persian Gulf region, he said, are 41% depleted.

Global oil and gas capacity is constrained by mature reservoirs and is facing a "15-year production plateau," Mr. Husseini said. He predicted that supply shortages will continue to add $12 to the price of oil for every million barrels a day in additional demand. Global demand, now at some 85 million barrels a day, was on average 10 million barrels a day lower in 1999.

.....

Andrew Gould, the chairman and chief executive of Schlumberger Ltd., an oil-services company, expressed similar concerns, noting that 70% of the oil fields that now quench world demand are more than 30 years old. The growth in global demand since 2003, he said, has been roughly the equivalent of the daily output from two of the world's larger suppliers: the North Sea and Mexico.

Read More

Darling Does U Turn

Alistair Darling, Chancellor of The Exchequer, has done a U turn over his plans for single rate 18% capital gains tax.

Having unleashed a storm of protest from business groups (such as the CBI) who complained that the removal of tapering relief would damage entrepreneurship, Darling has agreed to give £100K in tax relief for owners of small businesses who sell up and retire.

Therefore where will Darling now find the extra money needed to meet his U turn on CGT?

What the Chancellor gives with the one hand, he takes with the other.

Read More

Housing Is Nowhere Near the Bottom

From Bloomberg:

PMI Group Inc., the second-largest U.S. mortgage insurer, posted its first quarterly loss since its 1995 public offering as borrowers were unable to keep up with higher payments after their ``teaser'' rates expired. The company fell 10 percent in New York trading and a rating firm downgraded its debt.

.....

U.S. home foreclosures doubled in September from a year earlier as subprime homeowners struggled with payments, according to RealtyTrac Inc. MGIC Investment Corp, the largest mortgage insurer, also reported its first quarterly loss this month and predicted it won't be profitable in 2008. Mortgage insurers help reimburse home lenders when borrowers don't pay.

``The mortgage insurance industry at large is heading directly into the meat of the most challenging year or two in its history,'' said Seth Glasser, a credit analyst at Barclays Capital Inc. in a note to investors. He reiterated his ``underweight'' rating for PMI.

....

``The speed and the depth of the deterioration we saw in the third quarter, and in particular the month of September, was greater than we had expected,'' Smith said. Borrowers in California, Florida, Michigan, Indiana, Ohio and Illinois defaulted at rates exceeding the rest of the country, he said.

Anyone who is even thinking about calling a bottom in housing right now is just not paying attention to the underlying facts.

Read More

Housing Is Nowhere Near the Bottom

From Bloomberg:

PMI Group Inc., the second-largest U.S. mortgage insurer, posted its first quarterly loss since its 1995 public offering as borrowers were unable to keep up with higher payments after their ``teaser'' rates expired. The company fell 10 percent in New York trading and a rating firm downgraded its debt.

.....

U.S. home foreclosures doubled in September from a year earlier as subprime homeowners struggled with payments, according to RealtyTrac Inc. MGIC Investment Corp, the largest mortgage insurer, also reported its first quarterly loss this month and predicted it won't be profitable in 2008. Mortgage insurers help reimburse home lenders when borrowers don't pay.

``The mortgage insurance industry at large is heading directly into the meat of the most challenging year or two in its history,'' said Seth Glasser, a credit analyst at Barclays Capital Inc. in a note to investors. He reiterated his ``underweight'' rating for PMI.

....

``The speed and the depth of the deterioration we saw in the third quarter, and in particular the month of September, was greater than we had expected,'' Smith said. Borrowers in California, Florida, Michigan, Indiana, Ohio and Illinois defaulted at rates exceeding the rest of the country, he said.

Anyone who is even thinking about calling a bottom in housing right now is just not paying attention to the underlying facts.

Read More

Today's Markets

The SPYS opened lower and dropped. They rallied back to their opening, but then fell again near the close. Notice at the end the long candles and heavy volume. This indicates that traders were shedding positions before the close, not wanting to hold anything overnight. This indicates nervousness. Although the Fed won't release their interest rate decision until tomorrow afternoon, traders are probably concerned about an overnight fed related development.



On the daily chart notice there are six straight small candles in a row. This indicates there is a lack of strong sentiment in either way pushing the market in any direction. Instead, it looks like traders started to become concerned about the upcoming Fed meeting and have decided to sit on the sidelines until after the Fed releases their interest rate policy statement.



The QQQQs are on a different track. Because they are mostly related to technology -- and technology isn't mortgage related -- QQQQ traders are looking for further gains. However, like the SPYs we see a large sell-off at the end of the day on heavy volume.



Unlike the SPYs, there are a lot of bullish points on the QQQQ chart. All of the SMAs are moving higher and the shorter SMAs are higher than the longer SMAs. In addition, prices are above the SMAs which will pull the SMAs higher. Also note that prices consolidated for about a week and a half. The only problem with this chart is the declining volume over the last few days as the market went higher. However, I think Fed nervousness is the primary reason for this. If the Fed cuts tomorrow, I would expect the QQQQs to move higher.

Read More

Today's Markets

The SPYS opened lower and dropped. They rallied back to their opening, but then fell again near the close. Notice at the end the long candles and heavy volume. This indicates that traders were shedding positions before the close, not wanting to hold anything overnight. This indicates nervousness. Although the Fed won't release their interest rate decision until tomorrow afternoon, traders are probably concerned about an overnight fed related development.



On the daily chart notice there are six straight small candles in a row. This indicates there is a lack of strong sentiment in either way pushing the market in any direction. Instead, it looks like traders started to become concerned about the upcoming Fed meeting and have decided to sit on the sidelines until after the Fed releases their interest rate policy statement.



The QQQQs are on a different track. Because they are mostly related to technology -- and technology isn't mortgage related -- QQQQ traders are looking for further gains. However, like the SPYs we see a large sell-off at the end of the day on heavy volume.



Unlike the SPYs, there are a lot of bullish points on the QQQQ chart. All of the SMAs are moving higher and the shorter SMAs are higher than the longer SMAs. In addition, prices are above the SMAs which will pull the SMAs higher. Also note that prices consolidated for about a week and a half. The only problem with this chart is the declining volume over the last few days as the market went higher. However, I think Fed nervousness is the primary reason for this. If the Fed cuts tomorrow, I would expect the QQQQs to move higher.

Read More

What Inflation?

From the AP:

P&G said gross margins are expected to be temporarily lower this quarter due to higher commodity and energy costs and investments needed behind its North America laundry initiative, in which it is offering concentrated formulas of Tide and other liquid detergents in smaller containers.

P&G said it expects gross margins to recover in the second half of its fiscal year due to pricing and increased cost savings from restructuring projects.

P&G officials said they plan to pass along some of the rising costs for oil and raw materials to consumers for some items, including Pampers diapers, Charmin toilet paper and Olay and Ivory personal cleansing products.

Company officials said the price hikes planned over the next few months -- in most cases 5 percent or more -- come as competitors also are raising prices.

A.G. Lafley, P&G's chairman and chief executive, noted that U.S. consumers are pressured by higher energy costs and the housing and credit crunches, but said P&G and its industry traditionally hold up during economic slowdowns.

From the WSJ:

Cold weather hasn't hit the Northeast yet, but record heating-oil prices mean high heating bills are on the way for many residents.

About eight million U.S. households -- largely in New England and the Central Atlantic states -- rely on heating oil to run their furnaces each winter. Last week, heating-oil futures hit a record of $2.36 a gallon, up more than 40% since the start of the year.

Weather forecasters are predicting a colder winter than last year, despite the unseasonably warm October in the Northeast. That's going to lift heating costs no matter what fuel a homeowner uses. Consumers who use heating oil, though, will feel the most pain. Their winter heating bill for the season is expected to average $1,785, compared with $891 for households that use natural gas, according to the Department of Energy. Unlike crude oil, natural-gas prices have been relatively restrained in the U.S. this year.

But remember boys and girls -- according to the Federal Reserve's policy board, energy and food costs don't matter.

Read More

What Inflation?

From the AP:

P&G said gross margins are expected to be temporarily lower this quarter due to higher commodity and energy costs and investments needed behind its North America laundry initiative, in which it is offering concentrated formulas of Tide and other liquid detergents in smaller containers.

P&G said it expects gross margins to recover in the second half of its fiscal year due to pricing and increased cost savings from restructuring projects.

P&G officials said they plan to pass along some of the rising costs for oil and raw materials to consumers for some items, including Pampers diapers, Charmin toilet paper and Olay and Ivory personal cleansing products.

Company officials said the price hikes planned over the next few months -- in most cases 5 percent or more -- come as competitors also are raising prices.

A.G. Lafley, P&G's chairman and chief executive, noted that U.S. consumers are pressured by higher energy costs and the housing and credit crunches, but said P&G and its industry traditionally hold up during economic slowdowns.

From the WSJ:

Cold weather hasn't hit the Northeast yet, but record heating-oil prices mean high heating bills are on the way for many residents.

About eight million U.S. households -- largely in New England and the Central Atlantic states -- rely on heating oil to run their furnaces each winter. Last week, heating-oil futures hit a record of $2.36 a gallon, up more than 40% since the start of the year.

Weather forecasters are predicting a colder winter than last year, despite the unseasonably warm October in the Northeast. That's going to lift heating costs no matter what fuel a homeowner uses. Consumers who use heating oil, though, will feel the most pain. Their winter heating bill for the season is expected to average $1,785, compared with $891 for households that use natural gas, according to the Department of Energy. Unlike crude oil, natural-gas prices have been relatively restrained in the U.S. this year.

But remember boys and girls -- according to the Federal Reserve's policy board, energy and food costs don't matter.

Read More

Business Week Adds to the Comic Relief

From Business Week:

Yet some investors say such terrifying conditions are a great time to start buying stock in the financial sector.

Their argument: Financial stocks in the S&P 500 have tumbled almost 10% in the last six months, while the broader index is up 2.75%. Financial giants like Citigroup (C), Bank of America (BAC), Wachovia (WB), Merrill Lynch (MER), and big insurer AIG (AIG) are all trading at or just above one- and, in some cases, two-year lows.

....

For long-term investors, the beat-up financial sector may be the best place to look for bargains. The shares of some regional banks, in particular, are at levels that basically price in a "worst-case scenario" of a recession, says William Fitzpatrick, an equity analyst at Johnson Asset Management. Many banks are paying big dividends of 7% or 8%. On "any sort of recovery at all, these stocks are really going to rally," he says.

But Fitzpatrick and other expert investors warn that financial stocks are at low prices for very good reasons. Things really could go from bad to even worse.

Any title that implies financial stocks are in some way attractive right now is simply put really damn stupid. There are three years of resets ahead as the chart from the IMF below indicates. Calculated Risk has been posting on the declining ABS/CMBS indexes. Home prices are still dropping. Short version, the credit crunch is just starting and won't let up for some time.

Read More

Business Week Adds to the Comic Relief

From Business Week:

Yet some investors say such terrifying conditions are a great time to start buying stock in the financial sector.

Their argument: Financial stocks in the S&P 500 have tumbled almost 10% in the last six months, while the broader index is up 2.75%. Financial giants like Citigroup (C), Bank of America (BAC), Wachovia (WB), Merrill Lynch (MER), and big insurer AIG (AIG) are all trading at or just above one- and, in some cases, two-year lows.

....

For long-term investors, the beat-up financial sector may be the best place to look for bargains. The shares of some regional banks, in particular, are at levels that basically price in a "worst-case scenario" of a recession, says William Fitzpatrick, an equity analyst at Johnson Asset Management. Many banks are paying big dividends of 7% or 8%. On "any sort of recovery at all, these stocks are really going to rally," he says.

But Fitzpatrick and other expert investors warn that financial stocks are at low prices for very good reasons. Things really could go from bad to even worse.

Any title that implies financial stocks are in some way attractive right now is simply put really damn stupid. There are three years of resets ahead as the chart from the IMF below indicates. Calculated Risk has been posting on the declining ABS/CMBS indexes. Home prices are still dropping. Short version, the credit crunch is just starting and won't let up for some time.

Read More

There's No Housing Bubble!

Hat Tip to the Kirk Report

From October 2005:

Ben S. Bernanke does not think the national housing boom is a bubble that is about to burst, he indicated to Congress last week, just a few days before President Bush nominated him to become the next chairman of the Federal Reserve.

.....

"House prices are unlikely to continue rising at current rates," said Bernanke, who served on the Fed board from 2002 until June. However, he added, "a moderate cooling in the housing market, should one occur, would not be inconsistent with the economy continuing to grow at or near its potential next year."

Read More

There's No Housing Bubble!

Hat Tip to the Kirk Report

From October 2005:

Ben S. Bernanke does not think the national housing boom is a bubble that is about to burst, he indicated to Congress last week, just a few days before President Bush nominated him to become the next chairman of the Federal Reserve.

.....

"House prices are unlikely to continue rising at current rates," said Bernanke, who served on the Fed board from 2002 until June. However, he added, "a moderate cooling in the housing market, should one occur, would not be inconsistent with the economy continuing to grow at or near its potential next year."

Read More

Country Wide Offers Comic Relief

From the WSJ:

Countrywide Financial Corp. cheered investors last week by pledging a quick return to profitability, boosting the stock price that day 32%.

Consider the following chart from the IMF:



Also add this from IBD:

ABX indexes, barometers of demand for mortgage-backed securities, have plunged again in recent weeks. They range from the highest-rated AAA slice of mortgage debt to the riskiest tranches, rated BBB-.

The BBB- tranche from the second half of 2006 was worth just 17.94 cents on the dollar Monday, according to Markit.com. Some tranches eventually may prove worthless.

"It's probably not a straight shot to zero but it's close enough for me to stay fully invested," Lahde said.

....

Subprime loans from late 2006 are the worst of the worst. Lenders, desperate to keep loan origination strong, loosened their already-lax credit standards. Home prices were at or near their peaks. So these loans started going bad almost as soon as they were made — well before any interest rate resets.

Foreclosure filings doubled in September from a year ago. They are set to rise even further, dumping more homes on an already bloated market.

A record 17.9 million homes stood empty in the third quarter. It could get worse.

Does it look like a financial company that is heavily invested in the real estate market is going to bounce back from problems quickly?

Read More

Country Wide Offers Comic Relief

From the WSJ:

Countrywide Financial Corp. cheered investors last week by pledging a quick return to profitability, boosting the stock price that day 32%.

Consider the following chart from the IMF:



Also add this from IBD:

ABX indexes, barometers of demand for mortgage-backed securities, have plunged again in recent weeks. They range from the highest-rated AAA slice of mortgage debt to the riskiest tranches, rated BBB-.

The BBB- tranche from the second half of 2006 was worth just 17.94 cents on the dollar Monday, according to Markit.com. Some tranches eventually may prove worthless.

"It's probably not a straight shot to zero but it's close enough for me to stay fully invested," Lahde said.

....

Subprime loans from late 2006 are the worst of the worst. Lenders, desperate to keep loan origination strong, loosened their already-lax credit standards. Home prices were at or near their peaks. So these loans started going bad almost as soon as they were made — well before any interest rate resets.

Foreclosure filings doubled in September from a year ago. They are set to rise even further, dumping more homes on an already bloated market.

A record 17.9 million homes stood empty in the third quarter. It could get worse.

Does it look like a financial company that is heavily invested in the real estate market is going to bounce back from problems quickly?

Read More

Taxpayers Can Sue HMRC

The court of appeal ruling in favour of Neil Martin a builder who lost £500K, as a result of errors made by HMRC when it processed his company's Construction Industry Scheme (CIS) application in 1999, leaves HMRC open to being sued by taxpayers for errors.

The ruling means that HMRC has a duty of care to taxpayers, and taxpayers may now sue HMRC for damages in certain circumstances.

This is particularly relevant in cases where the HMRC help taxpayers with their returns.

The result will of course mean that HMRC will no longer offer taxpayers help in completing their returns, as such the process of submitting a return will become even more tortuous and difficult to complete.

Read More

A Closer Look at the Basic Materials Sector

Unlike the stock market rally of the 1990s, the latest rally is characterized by strong movements in basic materials. The reason is the growth of China and India. As these two countries have come on line -- and as they have developed their respective industrial bases -- they have demanded more and more raw materials. Hence, the run-up in the basic price of raw materials and the companies that extract them.

First, let's look at two charts of basic metals:



Copper really took-off in mid-2005, when the price moved from 1.50 to about 2.20 by year end. By early 2006 the price again increase to about 3.60, but then sold-off of the 2.60 level. Copper again rallied at the beginning of 2007 and is currently consolidating around the 3.50 area.

Simply put, this is a very bullish chart. There does appear to be upside resistance around the 3.75 area. On the bearish side, we could be seeing a double top forming. But for that to play out China and India would have to go off line. Considering they are currently growing over 10% year, that does not seem likely.



There have been two price runs in aluminum. The first occurred from mid-2003 to early 2004 when the price increased from about .65 to .8. The next big price run occurred from mid-2005 to early 2006 when prices increase from .8 to 1.10. Prices have been in a consolidation range from 1.10 to 1.30 since.

The point of the previous two charts is there is clearly money to be made in the raw materials/basic materials sector of the market. And the ETFs that trade in this area of the market have benefited.



The five year basic materials chart shows a classic bull market chart. We have higher lows and higher highs -- always a good sign. There are also two strong upward slanting trendlines in play. Since mid-2006 the XLBs have used the 200 day SMA as downside support. All in all, this is a great long term chart.



On the year long XLB chart there is a strong rally from November of 2006 to July of this year when the market sold-off. The XLBs traded down to their 200 day SMA and have rallied from that level.

However, the previous highs set in mid0July seem to be giving the index a hard time right now. Notice that in early October prices bunched up around the previous high but had to retreat to retest those levels. While prices have advanced beyond the mid-July levels, the volume has been less than inspiring -- especially yesterday's total. Also note the position of the moving averages. The 10 day SMA is below the 20 day SMA and the 20 day SMA is almost horizontal. While these are not fatal problems, they do not inspire a extreme confidence going forward.

I think a heavy sell-off is doubtful right now largely because the underlying fundamentals are incredibly strong. However, as noted in yesterday's IBD, 3Q basic materials earnings increased 0%. Considering the incredible bull run we have seen in this sector so far, I don't think traders will want to take all their respective chips off the table, instead opting for selling some of their positions in a weak market situation and waiting for fourth quarter results to come in.

Read More

A Closer Look at the Basic Materials Sector

Unlike the stock market rally of the 1990s, the latest rally is characterized by strong movements in basic materials. The reason is the growth of China and India. As these two countries have come on line -- and as they have developed their respective industrial bases -- they have demanded more and more raw materials. Hence, the run-up in the basic price of raw materials and the companies that extract them.

First, let's look at two charts of basic metals:



Copper really took-off in mid-2005, when the price moved from 1.50 to about 2.20 by year end. By early 2006 the price again increase to about 3.60, but then sold-off of the 2.60 level. Copper again rallied at the beginning of 2007 and is currently consolidating around the 3.50 area.

Simply put, this is a very bullish chart. There does appear to be upside resistance around the 3.75 area. On the bearish side, we could be seeing a double top forming. But for that to play out China and India would have to go off line. Considering they are currently growing over 10% year, that does not seem likely.



There have been two price runs in aluminum. The first occurred from mid-2003 to early 2004 when the price increased from about .65 to .8. The next big price run occurred from mid-2005 to early 2006 when prices increase from .8 to 1.10. Prices have been in a consolidation range from 1.10 to 1.30 since.

The point of the previous two charts is there is clearly money to be made in the raw materials/basic materials sector of the market. And the ETFs that trade in this area of the market have benefited.



The five year basic materials chart shows a classic bull market chart. We have higher lows and higher highs -- always a good sign. There are also two strong upward slanting trendlines in play. Since mid-2006 the XLBs have used the 200 day SMA as downside support. All in all, this is a great long term chart.



On the year long XLB chart there is a strong rally from November of 2006 to July of this year when the market sold-off. The XLBs traded down to their 200 day SMA and have rallied from that level.

However, the previous highs set in mid0July seem to be giving the index a hard time right now. Notice that in early October prices bunched up around the previous high but had to retreat to retest those levels. While prices have advanced beyond the mid-July levels, the volume has been less than inspiring -- especially yesterday's total. Also note the position of the moving averages. The 10 day SMA is below the 20 day SMA and the 20 day SMA is almost horizontal. While these are not fatal problems, they do not inspire a extreme confidence going forward.

I think a heavy sell-off is doubtful right now largely because the underlying fundamentals are incredibly strong. However, as noted in yesterday's IBD, 3Q basic materials earnings increased 0%. Considering the incredible bull run we have seen in this sector so far, I don't think traders will want to take all their respective chips off the table, instead opting for selling some of their positions in a weak market situation and waiting for fourth quarter results to come in.

Read More

Today's Markets

Not much really happened today in the markets. Basically we're waiting for the Fed to do something on Wednesday (or not -- wouldn't that be a surprise). Anyway, both markets opened higher and then found a tight range for the day.

Read More

Today's Markets

Not much really happened today in the markets. Basically we're waiting for the Fed to do something on Wednesday (or not -- wouldn't that be a surprise). Anyway, both markets opened higher and then found a tight range for the day.

Read More

Why Further Rate Cuts Will Only Hurt In the Long Term

From the WSJ:

Crude-oil futures rose past $93 a barrel for the first time on Monday, getting a lift as bad weather forced a halt to production in Mexico. Oil futures were also boosted by a weak dollar, which touched the lowest level against the euro in eight years.

Crude futures for December delivery rose as high as $93.20 a barrel in electronic trading. It also reached a new high of $92.56 in earlier regular trading. The contract was last seen up 59 cents, or 0.6%, to $92.45 a barrel.

>>>>>

"The Pemex shutdown is only putting a further floor under the already surging oil price, weakening dollar concerns are also pushing crude higher," said Kevin Kerr, president of Kerrtrade.com and editor of Dow Jones MarketWatch's Global Resources Trader.

The dollar dropped to $1.4438 per euro in early Monday morning, the weakest since the introduction of the 13-nation common currency in 1999. A weak dollar will increase the appeal of oil as an alternative investment.

From the WSJ:

Analysts said the dollar may continue to trade near its all-time low versus the euro as markets gear up for the interest rate decision Wednesday by the Federal Open Market Committee. The central bankers are expected to reduce rates to 4.50% from the current 4.75%, while some say it's possible the rate could be cut to 4.25%.

Lower rates by the Fed tend to hurt the greenback by lowering its appeal to investors looking for higher returns.

As we approach another possible rate cut, it's important to look at what that might actually do to inflation. One of the Fed's basic problems is most major commodities are priced in dollars. If the dollar is dropping in value this is a de factor price increase in most commodities. Additionally, as noted above, a weaker dollar encourages traders to bid up commodity prices as an inflation hedge.

First of all, the dollar is dropping.



This drop in the dollar is partially related to the increase in oil.



In addition, gold is increasing indicating traders are looking for an inflation hedge.



What makes this incredibly ironic is the Fed only looks at core inflation (this despite the clear indication that commodity prices are increasing in a year over year basis). So if the Fed lowers rates again they will further weaken the dollar. This will encourage traders to bid up the price of commodities priced in dollars which will add to commodity inflation. But this won't really count because the Fed only looks at core inflation.

This would be really funny ..... if it weren't something that would really hurt a lot of people.

Read More

Why Further Rate Cuts Will Only Hurt In the Long Term

From the WSJ:

Crude-oil futures rose past $93 a barrel for the first time on Monday, getting a lift as bad weather forced a halt to production in Mexico. Oil futures were also boosted by a weak dollar, which touched the lowest level against the euro in eight years.

Crude futures for December delivery rose as high as $93.20 a barrel in electronic trading. It also reached a new high of $92.56 in earlier regular trading. The contract was last seen up 59 cents, or 0.6%, to $92.45 a barrel.

>>>>>

"The Pemex shutdown is only putting a further floor under the already surging oil price, weakening dollar concerns are also pushing crude higher," said Kevin Kerr, president of Kerrtrade.com and editor of Dow Jones MarketWatch's Global Resources Trader.

The dollar dropped to $1.4438 per euro in early Monday morning, the weakest since the introduction of the 13-nation common currency in 1999. A weak dollar will increase the appeal of oil as an alternative investment.

From the WSJ:

Analysts said the dollar may continue to trade near its all-time low versus the euro as markets gear up for the interest rate decision Wednesday by the Federal Open Market Committee. The central bankers are expected to reduce rates to 4.50% from the current 4.75%, while some say it's possible the rate could be cut to 4.25%.

Lower rates by the Fed tend to hurt the greenback by lowering its appeal to investors looking for higher returns.

As we approach another possible rate cut, it's important to look at what that might actually do to inflation. One of the Fed's basic problems is most major commodities are priced in dollars. If the dollar is dropping in value this is a de factor price increase in most commodities. Additionally, as noted above, a weaker dollar encourages traders to bid up commodity prices as an inflation hedge.

First of all, the dollar is dropping.



This drop in the dollar is partially related to the increase in oil.



In addition, gold is increasing indicating traders are looking for an inflation hedge.



What makes this incredibly ironic is the Fed only looks at core inflation (this despite the clear indication that commodity prices are increasing in a year over year basis). So if the Fed lowers rates again they will further weaken the dollar. This will encourage traders to bid up the price of commodities priced in dollars which will add to commodity inflation. But this won't really count because the Fed only looks at core inflation.

This would be really funny ..... if it weren't something that would really hurt a lot of people.

Read More

Treasury Secretary Paulson Provides Comic Relief

From CNBC:

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson on Monday repeated his mantra that a strong dollar is in the best interests of the US, even as the currency was hitting fresh lows against the euro.

"I believe that a strong dollar is in our nation's interest and also that currency values should be set in a competitive marketplace based upon underlying economic fundamentals," Paulson said in response to a question about the greenback at a US-India CEO forum in Mumbai.

The markets say otherwise.




Look -- if the US wants a "strong dollar policy" they have to act like a strong dollar economy. That means things like exporting more than they import and not issuing mammoth amounts of new debt every year. You just can't say it; you have to act in a way that leads to that result.

Read More

Treasury Secretary Paulson Provides Comic Relief

From CNBC:

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson on Monday repeated his mantra that a strong dollar is in the best interests of the US, even as the currency was hitting fresh lows against the euro.

"I believe that a strong dollar is in our nation's interest and also that currency values should be set in a competitive marketplace based upon underlying economic fundamentals," Paulson said in response to a question about the greenback at a US-India CEO forum in Mumbai.

The markets say otherwise.




Look -- if the US wants a "strong dollar policy" they have to act like a strong dollar economy. That means things like exporting more than they import and not issuing mammoth amounts of new debt every year. You just can't say it; you have to act in a way that leads to that result.

Read More

More On Third Quarter Earnings

From IBD:



What does this tell us?

1.) The gains in consumer staples, health care and possibly telecom indicate more recession resistant economic areas are doing well.

2.) The cheap dollar is leading to rising exports which is helping industrials.

3.) Consumer discretionary is hurting. That indicates the US consumer may not be that healthy.

4.) Financials are taking a terrific hit from the subprime mess.

5.) I am completely mystified by tech's earnings gains. My main thought there is this is largely driven by growth in foreign markets, although any other observations would be great.

6.) the XLBs (Basic Materials ETF) is up 30.53% over the last year and 24.9% YTD. This ETF has been a market leader this year. But with earnings growth coming in at 0% so far this quarter, I have to wonder if traders will start to consider booking some profits for year end window dressing. The same can be said of energy (XLE), which is also a market leader of this rally, up 36.25% over the last year and 31.50% YTD.

Read More

More On Third Quarter Earnings

From IBD:



What does this tell us?

1.) The gains in consumer staples, health care and possibly telecom indicate more recession resistant economic areas are doing well.

2.) The cheap dollar is leading to rising exports which is helping industrials.

3.) Consumer discretionary is hurting. That indicates the US consumer may not be that healthy.

4.) Financials are taking a terrific hit from the subprime mess.

5.) I am completely mystified by tech's earnings gains. My main thought there is this is largely driven by growth in foreign markets, although any other observations would be great.

6.) the XLBs (Basic Materials ETF) is up 30.53% over the last year and 24.9% YTD. This ETF has been a market leader this year. But with earnings growth coming in at 0% so far this quarter, I have to wonder if traders will start to consider booking some profits for year end window dressing. The same can be said of energy (XLE), which is also a market leader of this rally, up 36.25% over the last year and 31.50% YTD.

Read More